--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@
wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" whynotnow7@
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From your reactions today, tartbrain, I assume you are
> > > > taking the role of Barry and Vaj's apologist? If not,
> > > > you are sure appearing that way to me dude.
> > > >
> > I guess first reply didn't take. What it was, was,
> >
> > Jim why don't you just respond to the question, instead
> > of finding some way to disqualify the questioner?
>
> There was no question in the post Jim was commenting on.
>
> If yer gonna kibbitz, pay attention!
>
It was referring to the question that was asked of Jim previously. If
you regard Jim's response as sufficient, then so be it. I found it
quite lame, and not a little arrogant. Jim seemed to pick up a whiff of
sympathy on Tart's part towards Barry and Vaj, and I guess for Jim, that
is a deal breaker in terms of responding to him in a straight forward
way.
