I agree completely. It is pretty obvious that Vaj, Bozotronic Barry and Sal are trying their best to enforce a double standard here. Anytime anyone says something positive about TM or Maharishi, they need a brief worthy of Supreme Court scrutiny in order to be believed by the naysayers. However, if the three stooges with 20 and 30 year old issues regarding TM and Maharishi ever proclaim something negative about the teacher or practice, their word is enough.
Pretty obvious who the adults are here.:-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardnelson108" > <richardnelson108@> wrote: > > As I have also said, if he or anyone else has issues with MMY, thats > fine with me. But if he is going to quote supposed events to make his > point, then use real events, not something he made up. > I am just trying to figure out what could be objectionable about this > statement or request. This would seem to be baseline for any > discussion along these lines. >
