"I'm actually a great lover of Hinduism." Let's see the sex tape, Vaj.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Rick Archer wrote: > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of authfriend > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 10:54 PM > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Notice of Infringement > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > On Behalf Of authfriend > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <rick@> > > wrote: > > > <snip> > > > [Nabby wrote:] > > > > Could it be one of the two Buddhists here ? :-) > > > > > > [Rick wrote:] > > > > Does it have anything to do with their being Buddhists? > > > > What if you were to ask, "Could it be one of the Jews here?" > > > > > [I wrote:] > > > False equivalence. You know better than that, Rick. > > > > > [Rick wrote:] > > > I don't agree. Nabby constantly uses "Buddhist" as a > > > pejorative. If he constantly referred to Jews with the > > > same tone, I think you would be offended. > > > > Being a Buddhist is a choice. Being Jewish is not. > > It's completely out of line for you to equate the two. > > > > As to Nabby's lack of respect for Buddhism, Vaj and > > Barry don't respect Hinduism, but I don't see you > > criticizing Vaj or Barry, just Nabby. > > > > > He also often refers to the "Dolly" Lama, not only in an > > > attempt to rankle anyone (especially Vaj and Barry) who > > > might respect him, but to belittle the man > > > > And of course neither Vaj or Barry ever refer to MMY in > > a belittling manner in an attempt to rankle those who > > might respect him, right, Rick? > > > > Boy, this seems to be double-standards day on FFL. > > > > You have a point Judy. Can't dispute it. I think it's juvenile > > whoever does it. As Bill Maher said last night on Piers Morgan, > > people have a problem with nuance. It's so easy to paint people and > > things in black and white, but reality is never that way. From my > > perspective, there's much more good than bad to be said about > > Maharishi, the Dali Lama, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc. It's silly to > > paint any of them entirely one way or the other. > > > > I'm actually a great lover of Hinduism. But it doesn't mean I have to > love EVERYTHING about Hinduism. So, no, I don't like widows hurling > themselves onto funderal pyres and while I love many saints and many > different traditions, not so much the pedophiles posing as saints - > and the followers trying to whitewash history to make such creeps > look like miracle workers (when they're merely glorified street > magicians). > > I DO like to see the historical record set straight and then people > can decide for themselves what's what. That's certainly the case with > MMY where the remaining hardcore TB'ers work hard at making him look > like "the greatest rishi of all yugas" and thus to obscure the actual > historical record. The truth is better than fiction. > > Buddhism's not immune from these same patterns. There are scam > artists everywhere. There are also beautiful people in the most > unsuspecting places. >
