On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:38 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 1, 2011, at 4:10 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > Of course, the only research on TM they cite in that book is
from 25 years ago, so one assumes that they are also quoting the
descriptions of pure consciousness in the research done 25 years ago.
>
>
> Not true Lawson, they used research up to 2004! And they used
what little was needed and of decent quality. It doesn't take
volumes to show what the relaxation response occurring in TM looks
like. I think your problem is you let yourself be wowed that
something special is happening. Real neuroscientists aren't as
easily fooled.
>
Perhaps I am mistaken. The only research on TM I saw cited was from
the 1980's.
> They can do all the research they want and fudge all the data
they want: we already know what is.
>
So, you're confident that all TM researchers are liars...
Some of the independent ones were good. That's why we were able to
determine the physiologic nature of TM long ago.
