--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > The big bang is only theory. The scientists are still puzzled why their > > equations break down at the singularity point. Another professor opined > > that the Quantum Cosmology Theory eliminates the problems at the > > singularity point. So, there you have it. > > > This is true. But it's the best theory around to describe the universe for > now. >
If theory only exists, then how do we know if God or god created anything? The best theory, is still a theory. The definition of what God or god is, is still to be defined by what is actual. Presence, can have more influence of knowing what was, by what is. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Matter cannot be created nor destroyed. A law of physics. > > > > > > > > > There's a theory called Quantum Cosmology which states that the universe > > > started out as a quantum wave function. MMY favored this theory when he > > > was alive. The theory presupposes that there is an observer in the > > > imaginary world for the wave function to exist. > > > > > > This wave function then collapsed or manifested into the real world as > > > the Big Bang. Thus, matter, time and space was created. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But God can create or destroy matter. > > > > > > I agree with this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steven Hawking's statement may have been the most profound thing he has > > > > said in his career. > > > > > > IMO, it's very dumb, or that he just made it to sell his books. In that > > > regard, he may be shrewd. > > > > > > > > He should resign for having an opinion that is different than someone > > > > else?? > > > > > > Yes, for the reasons given above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This article is insightful. Hawking is past his prime. He should > > > > > resign from his tenured position in Oxford or whatever university he > > > > > is associated with. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1308599/Stephen-Hawking-wrong-You- > > > > > > explain-universe-God.html#ixzz1cMJFSYon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
