Oh no..not brain tumor, god I hope not. Please have it checked out. Could be 
the 
cranial sacral, either way take care of yourself and sometimes it makes more 
sense after the dust settles.

LOL..on watching my Batgap video, I was very high, looking back the interview 
was probably a bit premature. I agree with most of what I said, its more like 
talking about a game while the game's still on. I can do a much better 
post-match analysis now, but who knows may be the game's still on?? So whatever 
happened was probably the best.

When you say Scorpio is that Tropical zodiac? I'm a Scorpio myself, not by the 
virtue of Sun being in Tropical Scorpio but my Mars, Venus and ascendant lord 
Jupiter in Scorpio. So it's all about sex, sex, sex..LOL..

What to to say about the foolishness and audacity of some of the idiots here 
trying to think they can sell their impotent, perverted, repressed views on sex 
unchallenged.



________________________________
From: Denise Evans <dmevans...@yahoo.com>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, November 12, 2011 12:12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: [Fairfield Life] Can an enlightened person 
have 
lust?

   
Ravi, I get this...I completely understand this.  Also, I watched your Bat Gap 
(most of it) interview this week.  It helped me with my current situation 
because something very odd is going on with me energetically.  Maybe its a 
brain 
tumor.  Maybe it's just that the work my cranial sacral guy is doing to subtly 
manipulate my structure to clear the blockages and allow it to receive and 
express "life force" energy (or something like that...again, I am trying not to 
over think or ask too much of my brain at this time) is working.  

Also, remember, I am a Scorpio woman and haven't been shut down my whole life, 
just the last few years and I was honestly, pretty happy about it for a number 
of reasons :)  Now, it appears that my energy may be  returning....I blame it 
on 
the FFL shaktipat effect (or should I be saying "shot put".

  


________________________________
From: Ravi Yogi <raviy...@att.net>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: [Fairfield Life] Can an enlightened person 
have 
lust?


  
Dear Denise,

FWIW I don't say anything anything that's not my experience. I kept my fucking 
mouth shut for 38 years - in fact I thought it was stupid to engage in 
spiritual 
discussions.

My experiences on sex match Sri Bhagwan and Osho say. I was tremendously 
blessed 
by the existence to marry a woman who made me feel like an abuser, pimp for 
daring to even entertain the thoughts of having sex with my own wife.

I was extremely virile, with strong sexual desire but for me sex always 
followed 
love so I couldn't beg my ex for sex, I was too proud nor was I like John, 
Willytex to force myself on her because I had a fucking license to sleep with 
her.

I suffered tremendously with shame, guilt, my sexual  fantasies. Not to talk 
about the anger, bitterness I felt at being constantly rejected of the 
tremendous love and attraction I felt for my ex.

I was forced to internalize them and through the grace of Mother Kali power 
heal 
and ascend.

You can't blame for that can you? My ex was only Guru.

Love - Ravi



________________________________
From: Denise Evans <dmevans...@yahoo.com>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, November  11, 2011 11:43:00  PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: [Fairfield Life] Can an enlightened person 
have 
lust?

  
Damn, it always gets back to "for the enlightened one......".  I'll have to 
make 
more of an effort to become "enlightened" in my next life.  


________________________________
From: Ravi Yogi <raviy...@att.net>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: [Fairfield Life] Can an enlightened person 
have 
lust?


  
Denise,

Yes - What Sri Bhagwan says is exactly what Osho would have said.

I have said before, but I would say that for an enlightened there is lust but 
there is no pain and suffering. Animal-like, animals have sex but it's not 
mental, it's not in the mind (which Sri Bhagwan referred to as psychological), 
they don't suffer from guilt,  shame.


In the absence of beliefs such as sex is sin - sex is seen for what it is just 
a 
biological need. No shame, no guilt, no archetypal guilt of abuser or being 
abused, hence no pain or suffering.



________________________________
From: Denise Evans <dmevans...@yahoo.com>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, November 11, 2011 11:02:09 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: [Fairfield Life] Can an enlightened person have 
lust?

  
This conversation has been kicked around plenty and is now passe.  However, I'm 
sending this anyway.  I simply could  not understand Sri Bhagavan on the video 
John sent so I decided to transcribe him and then I had to comment below 
because 
it was so non-sensical.  I did understand OSHO - his word choices came across 
more clearly and he was far funnier, I must say.  

Sri Bhagavan and OSHO are trying to say the same thing...are they not?  If one 
pulls way up and doesn't getting confused by the minutia or their personal 
beliefs [such as OSHO stating  that God raped the Virgin Mary and marriage 
inhibits freedom  (paraphrased)]?  

Sri Bhagavan speaks more indirectly.  I think he may be trying to cater to the 
American puritan roots and his ability with the English language may be 
inhibiting clear thought presentation as well. OSHO always has a crazy look in 
his eye and had me ROTFLMAO, if for no other reason than the pure irreverence 
of 
his statements.  


"Word Up"... Who has time for all that  "psychological romance stuff." 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZjAantupsA


SRI BHAGAVAN - transcribed

Question: Does lust exist for an enlightened person?

Answer:  Enlightened people can also have children, like unenlightened  people. 
 
 (Meaning that enlightened people can procreate...obviously - it's a biological 
function.)

If an enlightened person  has got lust, we can talk about lust, biologicallust. 
 In normal people, it is psychological lust. (Biological/psychological...it's 
all interrelated and it's all biological because that's the way the hormones 
work in the body. He's parsing to make a point, which is that enlightened 
people 
can have lust too, so  yes, John, please feel free to sleep with  your wife 
this 
week too :).  He's just trying to create an artificial boundary in order to 
keep 
the enlightened man in a separate category.) 

For the enlightened person, it is more animal like, it is just part of the 
body, 
that's all (I think that perhaps what he is really trying to say is that the 
enlightened man realizes that consciousness encompasses (wrong word choice?) 
the 
body and that the body comes with animal instincts....yes, my kids started 
learning how their body works in elementary school..no big aha moment  here.)

Now,  the unenlightened person can sit alone and be thinking about lust (Yes, 
she can). 

The enlightened man cannot do that because the mind doesn't come up with 
supporting pictures. (Yeah, right - FFL is a good  example of the truth of this 
 
statement.) So, there is no mental lust or psychological lust.  (Again, it's 
all 
the same  thing so yes, there is.  He's also speaking to our American 
puritan-based roots which create self-talk that says..."we know it's wrong 
but we can't help ourselves." ).

But, let us say there is a woman - understanding there can be physical lust. 
 And of course he (the enlightened  man) is not going to violate any law and 
may 
have a relationship with his wife and produce children.  But, this biological 
lust is really really little (Yeah, right)  - and can be a good solution to 
population problems (Please, stop).

But, then let us say there is a person - an enlightened person - and there is a 
woman going there and there is physical lust.   After she moves away from the 
range of vision - it's gone - he cannot think about her (I think he's trying to 
say that an enlightened man stays in the moment).

Lust came, lust went - that's all.  It will not cause a problem (It might for 
the woman...stereotypical male statement).  But, the other (unenlightened man) 
will be thinking of....will go off and chase.....that does not happen for the 
enlightened person (Yeah, like celebrities. Women come to them.)  

After this week of reading all your posts, I might beg to differ on that point, 
but never mind me, I'm an unenlightened, depressed, stressed, fear-based, 
shame-based, slightly overweight, immuno-compromised, middle-aged, woman.  Whew 
- now there's a good visual.   Luckily, my personal version of the 
hopey-changey  
thing is beginning to work for me.  I don't always know what FFL is saying, but 
what I'm hearing is: "It's  o.k., you can be here, we have a lot of  experience 
with realities here, we are experts in management here. Oh, by the way, have 
you 
heard the one about the Raja's and the Domers?"  

OSHO


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ocbZhRQS9I


No transcribing needed.

Freedom-hoppin' starts in pretty good here after the song gets rolling - tee 
hee:  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rd8VzNGjL0&feature=related

















 












 

Reply via email to