That's a fair position, what more could on ask for?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seekliberation" <seekliberation@...>
wrote:
>
> I probably shouldn't make too many comments about global warming, being as I
> know little about it. For all I know, it's real. But it wouldn't surprise
> me at all if there was some manipulation going on with numbers and
> statistics, and I mean that on both sides. Oil companies vs. green companies
> are fighting for government funding all the time. So i'm sure scientists on
> both sides have a bias depending on who's side they're on. No offense to the
> honorable Al Gore or the evil oil companies.
>
> seekliberation
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seekliberation" <seekliberation@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm sure those new emails are inaccurate and untruthful,
> > > because Al Gore already told us that global warming is real.
> >
> > While an apt comment, you have to admit that many here
> > on this forum (such as Nabby, and possibly even wgm4u)
> > would have not the slightest doubt that global warming
> > was real if Maharishi had said it was.
> >
> > For those who cite "authorities," it's not about logic
> > or anything else, only who they consider to be an
> > authority. It's personality worship, not rationality.
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" <anitaoaks4u@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Rock The Global Warming Debate
> > > > 86 comments, 1 called-out
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > A new batch of 5,000 emails among scientists central to the assertion
> > > > that humans are causing a global warming crisis were anonymously
> > > > released to the public yesterday, igniting a new firestorm of
> > > > controversy nearly two years to the day after similar emails ignited
> > > > the Climategate scandal.
> > > >
> > > > Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent
> > > > scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to
> > > > conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2)
> > > > these scientists view global warming as a political "cause" rather than
> > > > a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly
> > > > admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on
> > > > deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warming-debate/
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
