--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Whoa. Why? But 'why'? Three things at least, 1. I live here and > > > > > this is in my neighborhood, it effects me. 2. I'd like to see them > > > > > succeed for large and small reasons. And 3. How they behave affects a > > > > > lot of my friends here. It is about that simple. -Buck > > > > > > > > > > > > Nothing is as simple as not doing something. Don't see "saints". Very > > > > simple, your problem solved. > > > > > > > > > > Except that *it* is become a communal problem because the Rajas link > > > their anti-saint policy with meditating in the dome. Theirs is simply a > > > bad corrosive policy for communal success with the dome numbers. > > > > > > > That their policy has bled the dome of numbers should be a concern of > > everyone here. > > > > Even the Fairfield Chamber of Commerce too really ought to step in a mediate > the situation. >
Linking that old anti-saint policy with getting in to the group meditation has always been a long-term problem with getting sufficient numbers meditating in the domes.
