> 
> 
> 
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 
> > > > > > > > > <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Whoa.  Why?  But 'why'?  Three things at least, 1. I live 
> > > > > > > > > > > here and this is in my neighborhood, it effects me.   2. 
> > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to see them succeed for large and small reasons. 
> > > > > > > > > > > And 3. How they behave affects a lot of my friends here.  
> > > > > > > > > > > It is about that simple.  -Buck
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Nothing is as simple as not doing something. Don't see 
> > > > > > > > > > "saints". Very simple, your problem solved.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Except that *it* is become a communal problem because the 
> > > > > > > > > Rajas link their anti-saint policy with meditating in the 
> > > > > > > > > dome.  Theirs is simply a bad corrosive policy for communal 
> > > > > > > > > success with the dome numbers.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > That their policy has bled the dome of numbers should be a 
> > > > > > > > concern of everyone here.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Even the Fairfield Chamber of Commerce too really ought to step 
> > > > > > > in to mediate the situation.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Linking that old anti-saint policy with getting in to the group 
> > > > > > meditation has always been a long-term problem with getting 
> > > > > > sufficient numbers meditating in the domes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > It is more than past time to change it.  It is time come to de-link 
> > > > > the sitting with saints from meditating in the domes.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Like, they even teach the little children in the Maharishi School to 
> > > > keep the company of wise people.
> > > 
> > > As has been said before, many times, Maharishi himself is the person who 
> > > established this "link" between seeing other saints or teachers and being 
> > > banned from TM courses and Domes and advanced programs. The Rajas did not 
> > > think up this policy - it came straight from MMY and he enforced it his 
> > > entire life - and they have decided to stick with the Master's policy.  
> > > To change this, they will have to be honest about that and then make a 
> > > decision that it is okay to modify what Maharishi himself set up.  Not 
> > > sure that will happen anytime soon.  Not with Bevan around.  Of course 
> > > with Oprah interested and also seeing other saints and being very 
> > > ecumenical indeed, that may push things a bit.  THe Rajas could announce 
> > > that in this day and age of rising enlightenment globally, it is okay to 
> > > be more open and less restrictive.  If they wanted to they could figure 
> > > out how to change this.
> > >
> > 
> > Like Jeesus, even Guru Dev told people to sit with saints, mahatmas and the 
> > wise.
> >
> 
> Any of us who know the TM initiation puja have done the puja to Guru Dev a 
> whole lot more than to Maharishi.  Even Maharishi would do it to the Guru Dev 
> picture and say "Jai Guru Dev"!
>

It is time.  It is time to put Guru Dev ahead of Maharihsi and go with Guru Dev 
on this communal problem with that anti-saint problem.  It is time to de-link 
sitting with saints from meditating in the domes.

Reply via email to