Yep, all true. My daughter used to go to clubs in SF before she could drink and 
there was no way she would be able to get a beer or anything else, except soft 
drinks and water. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> If  you lived in San Francisco and knew the club Ravi was referring to, has 
> tight restrictions to get into the club in the first place. Second, if there 
> were "minors," allowed in, they do not have the stamps on their hands like 
> the legal requirement age does. To hand over a shot in a club like that, 
> would get one kicked out, thrown out and even arrested by the management if a 
> legal aged person is caught giving a minor alcohol. The city is very strict 
> on ordinances, the county and state levels, the management at that venue, 
> especially in particular follows the rules.
> Ravi was pulling your legs and they ain't very long to pull, if you know what 
> I mean. 
> Ravi is more aware of what he writes than you think.
> 
> You dudes are attempting to put his hotdog on a slicer. You are worse that 
> Mrs. Bobbitt.  Love and peace and we can all share, alright? ; ) 
> 
> O' lord of the flies, do you see the shit growing on here....
> 
>  
>  
>  
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" <reavismarek@> wrote:
> >
> > An 18-year old in California is not a minor, but is prohibited from 
> > consuming alcohol. Furnishing alcohol to someone under the age of 21 is a 
> > violation of Business & Professions Vode section 25658, a misdemeanor 
> > offense punishable by no more than one year in the county jail and a fine.
> > 
> > ***
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The one you seem unfamiliar with, the real one.  We protect our minors 
> > > > on this side of the ocean.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is a 19 year old woman a minor ?
> > > Weird place your California...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > "Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor" California
> > > > 
> > > > Penal Code 272 PC
> > > > 
> > > >     "Contributing to the delinquency of a minor is a common crime for 
> > > > which thousands of people in California get prosecuted every year.
> > > > 
> > > > The most classic scenario is an adult who gets caught supplying alcohol 
> > > > or drugs to a teenager. But as the article below explains, Penal Code 
> > > > 272 PC is actually much broader than most people realize. Parents and 
> > > > strangers alike can get prosecuted for any behavior that tends to lead 
> > > > a minor down a path towards criminality, truancy from school, or 
> > > > becoming a dependant of the juvenile court."
> > > > 
> > > > I'm sure the arrest would go smoothly and not result in any additional 
> > > > charges for wacky erratic behavior and that his employer and 
> > > > contentious ex would be sympathetic about this matter.
> > > > 
> > > > Oh yeah, and lets not forget this wasn't wine with dinner, this was 
> > > > tequila shots, so if she careens into a family of four on her way home, 
> > > > or is physically harmed in any way as a result of his actions, it all 
> > > > gets promoted to a felony.
> > > > 
> > > > But don't worry Nabbie, he was just kidding and as Judy pointed out, I 
> > > > tricked him into saying all this stuff in that way only she and Robin 
> > > > can detect.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Excellent push back Curtis.  I feel much better.  That type of spin 
> > > > > > put
> > > > > > on by Judy and some others cannot be allowed to go uncontested. I 
> > > > > > simply
> > > > > > cannot get dialed in to the justification that Judy (in particular) 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > others feel they need to provide to Ravi.  I am in total agreement 
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > your analysis.  Of course Ravi interacted with that 19 year old as 
> > > > > > he
> > > > > > described.  And you know what, who cares.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Curtis got all excited because Ravi gave a drink to this girl of 19, 
> > > > > claiming she is underaged. In my world she is a woman. What kind of 
> > > > > weird world is he living in ?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to