--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > What will be interesting to see is whether those who have > piled on to Ravi's delusions and encouraged them to further > their own petty vendettas will support him, or you.
Barry, let me underline your above sentence with a big red marker. > If they walked their talk, there would be no question what > they would do, would there? But to do so would involve > actual integrity, so on this forum there's just no tellin' > what's going to happen. You are spot on again. How could people have such a lack of discrimination? Especially those who talk about morals and integrity all the time, they have totally lost it with me. This is the example, the real live example of the discriminative power of the pro TMers. It needs you to point this out to them. In both cases they support the enlightenment delusions of people, in both cases, this is morally wrong to those people. It is a lack of integrity only supported by their sophistry. All those, who supposedly spend the last 17 years to support the agenda of TM, with the aim to counterbalance any negative spin on it, they just put those 17 years into the trash-bin with this act. Do they think, any higher up in TMO would be happy about this, about them lining up behind these cases? Somebody utterly abusive as, most probably pi-polar as to his own verdict, show casing enlightenment? Or somebody who summoned Maharishi to the court, for his own delusional reasons? (Where is Lawson when you need him?) I see no moral integrity in this, no sincerity in it at all. I cannot believe all this happened here. The TMer in me, that is still there somewhere, in my appreciation for what I have received as gifts in my life and youth, is deeply disgusted at this. You, Barry, out of all, you nailed this.
