--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote:
>
> > Fornication Under the Command of the King, You, Curtis.
> > How dare you write about someone's mental health and diagnosing it without
> > a license, after they are removed from the forum.
> > That is one sad blues tune, dude. Shame on you.
>
> I diagnosed nothing. We know the facts of the situation from his own words.
> Without the wacky spiritual enabling, we had a sad case from the get go. And
> news flash, its all brain chemistry, including your ability to restrain
> yourself with an appropriate level of insult.
>
> So shame back on you. I consider my view to be much more compassionate than
> yours.
>
If freedom of speech never existed, the blues would have never existed.
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I find 90% of Ravi's posts amusing and interesting.
> > > > Compared to 90% of the posts from Curtis which I find brimming with
> > > > boring self-adorations, disgusting moralism or rants against God or
> > > > Maharishi from an ego on the verge of exploding in self-importance.
> > > >
> > > > So there ! :-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Your post kind of illustrates the difference doesn't it Nabbie? Your
> > > post was much more thoughtfully insulting than anything he ever wrote,
> > > but you did it in a totally non-malicious way. You didn't drop a bunch
> > > of F bombs and MF bombs and you didn't accuse me of something false that
> > > could hurt me in real life. You got your buzz from putting me down but
> > > no animals or humans were hurt in the making of your insults.
> > >
> > > I think rpost reflects the more thoughtful nature of the place. But that
> > > is just my opinion and now the tribe and tribal leaders have spoken.
> > >
> > > And there are no winners here. I have always believed that we were
> > > dealing with a betrayal of brain chemistry so I can only wish him well on
> > > his rocky road ahead. Kids road even rockier.
> > >
> > > This is no cause for celebration for me. But I'm glad the change was
> > > made. I suspect it caused everyone to consider what line we want to
> > > encircle us as we gather here for conversation.
> > >
> > >
> > Fornication Under the Command of the King, You, Curtis.
> > How dare you write about someone's mental health and diagnosing it without
> > a license, after they are removed from the forum.
> > That is one sad blues tune, dude. Shame on you.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > > > > <anartaxius@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > While I do not object to Ravi's rants, I do feel he is exceeding
> > > > > > social interaction limits, like a guest shitting on one's dining
> > > > > > room table. So I support Curtis's position here. I think it
> > > > > > prudent for Ravi to tone it down. It is not playful, and it is
> > > > > > not helpful.
> > > > >
> > > > > I, for one, would love to see who agrees with this
> > > > > statement, and who does not.
> > > > >
> > > > > Step up to the line and declare your allegiance with
> > > > > Ravi, or do the opposite.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then live with it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I find 90% of Ravi's posts amusing and interesting.
> > > > Compared to 90% of the posts from Curtis which I find brimming with
> > > > boring self-adorations, disgusting moralism or rants against God or
> > > > Maharishi from an ego on the verge of exploding in self-importance.
> > > >
> > > > So there ! :-)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
