--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote:
WTF - What a wonderful juxtaposition of posts. "LOL" (Sorry to be so far behind) > WTF..here I am talking about my beloved, love, sex, hate, pain, bliss, > longing, separation, oneness and you are talking about this garbage. You > must be suffering from irrevocable, irreparable, irretrievable brain > damage, am I correct in assuming this shaim307? > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:37 PM, shainm307 <shainm307@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shainm307" shainm307@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Is anyone else interested in how this works? > > > > > > It sure interests me. I don't have a clue how it > > > works. > > > > > > > Anyone else curious on how reality manifests itself > > > > and what determines differnt outcomes? This is what > > > > John Hagelin told us > > > > > > What's what John Hagelin told us? > > John told our physics class this when we asked him a few years back. > > > > but he made it clear that he isn't 100% certain > > > > > > That's intriguing. I've never heard him say that > > > about anything (but then I haven't been listening > > > to whatever he's said lately). > > He said something like "You have no idea just how complicated this really > > is and you're not letting me off the hook here." Then he also said "It > > honest to God is random." > > > and > > > > it's more comlicated than you can imagine. He said > > > > that it is an unnatural question but reality will > > > > provide you with an answer. > > > > > > That's pretty cryptic. Any idea what he means? > > > > > > > He also said it could be an entity on the other side. > > > > > > Whoa. What kind of "entity"? On the other side of what? > > > And what's "it" referring to? > > He's probally refering to the Hidden Sector Matter part of the universe or > > the other side of the equation in Hectoratic E8xE8 > > > > also he said it's just the will of God. Anyone else > > > > have their speculations on how this works. I have > > > > my own speculation but I'm probably wrong on something. > > > > > > Why don't you post your speculation, give us something > > > to bounce off of? > > I think how your reality manifests itself is based off random > > probabilities with the exception of Maxwell's Daemon which manifests things > > in an unrandom way. This is all due to the potentiality waves based off > > probabilities with the height of the wave the most likely outcome; Maxwells > > Demon just influences the probabilities( John made this clear in his > > physics class if you ever took it). So you live your day through the > > probabilities with the collapse of the wave function being determined in a > > random way(Randomness is my specualtation as scientists aren't sure). Now > > here comes the unrandom part: your thoughts determine what Maxwell's Demon > > determines in an unrandom fashion. The random part is the confusing part as > > it is hard to think how can something be random and what the sequence is in > > the whole process. This once again would be my speculation, as I think it > > is all determined by you. This is what I think matters in the whole > > randomness part: freewill, love, what matters, intelligence of the > > universe, creativity of the universe and of course God, plus probably a > > lot more. I havn't captured the whole random process but I imagine it's > > based off your freewill. > > > > > "Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, 'But how > > can it be like that?' because you will get 'down the drain,' into a blind > > alley from which nobody has yet escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like > > that."--Richard Feynman on the apparent absurdities of quantum behavior > > > > > > "The chance is high that the truth lies in the fashionable direction. > > But, on the off chance that it is in another direction â" a direction > > obvious from an unfashionable view of field theory â" who will find it? > > Only > > someone who has sacrificed himself by teaching himself quantum > > electrodynamics from a peculiar and unfashionable point of view; one that > > he may have to invent for himself."--Richard Feynman, Nobel lecture, 1965 > > > > > > > > > >
