--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Actually, I am glad to learn, that I was not the only > person who didn't understand, and that it wasn't really > my missing English capabilities.
It wasn't. I was hoping that the explanation lay in a charge of PUI (Posting while Under the Influence). If it wasn't, then the issue may be more serious, an inability to tell when one is making sense and when one is not. > You see, the girls were actually piling onto Judy's > reaction to me, in the illusion she had just finished me. I don't know, and I don't care. All I noticed was that several posts were made that should have made anyone in their right mind go "Huh?" I commented because they didn't seem to. A trend I find dismaying on Fairfield Life in recent months is that a LOT of people seem to have lost the discrimination to tell what it gibberish or outright insanity, and what is some kind of wisdom or profundity. I get the feeling that a lot of people here really can't tell the difference any more, either when they are writing (which is somewhat excusable if they're caught up in a manic episode, as some of our posters are from time to time), or when they are reading (which it is more difficult to find an excuse for). > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Not like some dudes on this forum who piss the spot with > > > > > complete teeth grinding bark, protection for their red > > > > > fire hydrant in multiple layers of consciousness available > > > > > if only to break through their awareness as something more > > > > > that tangible, all muddled together 75 foot lead wall with > > > > > dancing football cheerleaders in cowboy lingerie. > > > > > Nabby not included. He has some morals about morals. > > > > > > > > Let me guess. You've been taking the same "How To > > > > Write Completely Incoherent English" correspondence > > > > course that MZ, Ravi, and Bob Price took, right? > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > Replace the "that," with "than," just before tangible. > > > I was lowering my standards to get to the group of very > > > unaware seekers who think they know everything that is > > > under the Ravi (Sun). > > > LMAO. > > > : ) > > > Let me translate the above for you, since you appear to > > > wish to understand: > > > > No thanks. > > > > I was trying, in a humorous way, to express concern > > for you. I was hoping that last night's posts from > > you were the result of some kind of intoxicant, and > > that by morning you'd have sobered up or come down > > enough to realize that the things you posted made > > little sense. Instead you double down. This makes > > me even more concerned, suspecting that you actually > > believe that your original rant makes perfect sense > > if you just replace "that" with "than." I for one > > am not convinced it does, or that the new rant helps > > it *to* make sense. > > > > > There are men who type on this FFL forum, who act like > > > dogs and mark their location and their looking for other > > > opposite sex dogs by peeing on a red fire hydrant > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvjVO_n0XFg > > > all the while their minds are thinking about > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dgpsI1MdQI and say, "Huh? > > > Why can I not see past my own hand?" > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw0B4C__b-M > > > and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKg8G9sMWUY > > > You are not out of that category as you mention above, Turq. > > > Add your name in there too. Always peeing on Judy's fire > > > hydrant like a dog in heat. > > > : ) > > > > > >
