I think I owe an apology to you, Ann.  When you arrived here a few days ago, I 
thought you had been asked by Robin to join FFL.  The reason for that 
assumption is that he had recently asked if anyone who knew him back in the 
70's and 80's would please post here about what he was like then and what it 
was like to be involved in his course. And you appeared! Robin wanted to defuse 
Vaj's comments about those times.  I thought you were responding to that call 
from Robin.  I also thought you would then clear up some of the issues between 
Vaj's perception of the events surrounding Robin, and Robin's own memories.

Whether you are here to support Robin or not, I do not know. But your comments 
are interesting. Welcome.  I described your posts as "evasive"   because I 
wanted you to explain in more detail about your time with Robin.   That was an 
unfair characterization by me. So, now that I am home from work and have a 
chance  to read the posts of today and settle down and spend more than 30 
seconds at FFL, I realize I made a mistake.  You obviously have no obligation 
to answer questions about your time with Robin.  Just enjoy your time here at 
FFL and, again, welcome. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > Because there have been only very general statements and nothing
> > > at all specific or informative, my vote is that this is a friend
> > > of Robin's.  Or Robin hmiself?
> > 
> > Oh, Susan, good grief! Can you really not tell the
> > huge difference in writing styles? Robin couldn't write
> > in the uncomplicated manner Ann does if you held a gun
> > to his head.
> Different writing style, for sure.  But an evasiveness that made me think, 
> initially, that she was affiliated with or was Robin trying to defend himself.
> > 
> > > Something off about it all, right from the beginning.
> > 
> > Great, let's now see what kind of psychiatric diagnosis
> > we can pin on Ann.
> 
> A psychiatric diagnosis was not at all what I was even thinking.  That idea 
> is yours.
> > 
> > What, pray, would be "off" about a friend of Robin's
> > from his past showing up on FFL? Especially if she'd
> > found out he was holding forth here? Remember, for 25
> > years he'd deliberately made himself inaccessible to
> > his former followers.
> > The off part is the evasiveness - talking about being heavily involved for 
> > 3 years, but never giving any details at all. I do recognize she might not 
> > want to give those details.  Still I find it somewhat evasive.
> > And why don't you express your suspicions to her face?
> 
> I did post to her directly.
> >
>


Reply via email to