Actually, I didn't mean "evaluate" it in the sense of *someone* he was evaluating, just *what* he was evaluating (your posts/words online) that were also available for the rest of us to read. I didn't make a judgment on whether you were perpetuating falsehoods or not, as I really have no idea. I did decide that the way you communicated to him was in large part contemptuous (e.g., calling him Robindra). Of course I don't know the back story...you never illuminated this for the readers in a way that fostered credibility. But, it wasn't my discussion and still isn't; I'm pretty clear on that. I was responding to a comment that Barry made in his post with this comment.
________________________________ From: Vaj <vajradh...@earthlink.net> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 6:21 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Trend Analysis For Dummies On Feb 8, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Emily Reyn wrote: Barry! You responded to my post - maybe I'm not on your DNRL after all - so good for my ego to be acknowledged in the world of virtual reality - thank you :) > >I believe Robin had plenty to *individually* evaluate from Vaj's posts, but >that's just IMO. And a rather naive one. In the presence of long and on-going disinformation campaigns, it would be extremely unlikely that a responder would have a clear way to evaluate someone. And of course, that includes you as well. Suffice to say that Robin totally fell hook, line and sinker for the disinformation he was fed - most of it based on items I had never discussed in his brief tenure here, so clearly it had to come from another source. So when you see someone spewing what you absolutely know to be disinformation, it's easy for me to see the source, but Robin either let himself be deliberately deceived and played along or he was totally bamboozled by character assassination tactics. In turns out, despite the verbosity, R. wasn't that intuitive, not that insightful and rather unenlightened from my POV. It was rather sad to watch. But then I had some past experience with which to evaluate him by way of comparison.
