--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote: > > On 02/13/2012 06:11 PM, Buck wrote: > > Non-meditation > > > > It seems to me that many non-meditators have forgottenor never knewwhat > > it is like to suffer an unhappy collision with scientific rationality. We > > are open to good evidence and sound argument as a matter of principle, and > > are generally willing to follow wherever they may lead. Certain of us have > > made careers out of bemoaning the failure of people to adopt this same > > attitude. > > > > However, I recently stumbled upon an example of secular intransigence that > > may give readers a sense of how spiritual people feel when their methods as > > technologies are criticized. As you will see but for the rigorous research > > conducted it suggests that it is worth thinking > > about. We can call the phenomenon of non-meditation "the delusion". > > > > The unhappy truth about non-meditation has been scientifically established > > to a moral certainty: That non-meditation is bad for you. It is bad for > > your children. It is bad for your neighbors and their children. > > Non-meditation is also completely unnecessary, because in the developed > > world we suppose we invariably have better and more effective alternatives > > for meditation even in our homes. If you > > are a non-meditator in the United States, Europe, Australia, or any other > > developed nation, you are most likely doing so recreationallyand the > > persistence of this habit is a major source of anti-spiritual pollution in > > cities throughout the world. > > > > > > In fact, non-meditation often contributes more harmful parameters of > > negativity particulates to the urban air than any other source. > > Certainly a human life is a terrible potential to waste in non-meditation. > > > > -Buck in FF > > Who are the non-meditators, Buck? >
Well, according to the best of science being done, non-meditators evidently are our communal problem.
