--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@...> wrote: > > IMO, this is where physicists, like Stephen Hawking, are getting confused. > He's written in his latest book that there is no need of a Divine Being to > create this universe or any others outside this one. He fails to see that > the very act of having a three dimensional universe requires consciousness to > support it. Without consciousness there is NOTHING.
But why? Why do 3 dimensions need consciousness? they are there whether we are or a universal type consciousness exists. I'm sure Hawking considered these points as part of his training. > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > > How 'bout "everything is consciousness"? In fact it would be pretty > > hard to prove that everything isn't consciousness. ;-) > > > > > > On 05/14/2012 11:24 AM, John wrote: > > > According to MMY, everything is based in consciousness. If there wasn't > > > any consciousness, there wouldn't be any existence or creativity. So, > > > for any universe to manifest, IMO there would have to be a consciousness > > > to create width, length, and height, at the very least. The dimension of > > > time could be optional. IOW, this universe would be similar to an empty > > > box and nothing else. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shainm307"<shainm307@> wrote: > > >> Interesting thing for all the Fairfielders: In a channeling of > > >> pleiadians I heard "the difference between consciousness and existence > > >> is creativity" kind of goes against Maharishi, unless Maharishi was just > > >> going very broad. > > >> > > > > > > > > >
