--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "TurquoiseB" <turquoiseb@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" > <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > I guess it boils down to that most curious trait that makes people > > in the TMO (and perhaps other groups) ascribe enlightenment to > > people simply because they like them. > > What I find even more curious is the number of people who > ascribe enlightenment to people based on what they SAY.
I don'e even believe in enlightenment so that takes me off the hook. > > As if words could ever either indicate enlightenment or > describe it. Well, if there was such a thing as enlightenment then doesn't something have to indicate it? And if not, then no wonder I don't believe such a state exists, it is impossible to perceive!! > > In my book, the less said, the better. :-) Dear Barry, then why do you talk so much? Not that I think there is anything wrong with that, but it is the fact that it goes against what you say you like in others (and presumably in yourself) that mystifies me. One day I might figure you out. But in the meantime I will just keep puzzling over those little statements like what you just wrote (last sentence above). > > > [https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/524374_344324698\ > 988992_1494133181_n.jpg] >
