http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1SfzV67Bqw

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
<anartaxius@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote:
> >
> > Xeno, what you say about me is true in that I *am* recovering from a pretty 
> > near-on total collapse of mind, body, and spirit.  It was in the works for 
> > awhile and I have benefited from the forum - I feel less crazy, for one 
> > thing :).  Now, of course, while I agree with you re: Barry's guerilla war 
> > tactics, I disagree that Robin doesn't  also challenge the foibles of 
> > those "caught up in spirituality"  and, I think he has an extremely 
> > well-refined "wicked" sense of humor.  Yes, Barry needs finishing school, 
> > at the very least.  Ha. 
> > 
> > Have a fabulous vacation - the best vacations are those out of touch with 
> > technology, IMO.  And, thank you for the musical link - lovely.  I always 
> > enjoy what you write, btw, and thank you for being here.  
> 
> As for Robin 'not challenging spiritual foibles', I am not sure I said that. 
> I think I said I thought he did not get it right, that I disagreed with him. 
> He does challenge, but it is not always clear to me what his motivation is. 
> One has to go about this from experience. If we conceptualise it as being 
> more expanded or less expanded, then if one is more expanded one has a chance 
> of seeing where someone less expanded is hung up; its not guaranteed. If one 
> is less expanded, it is a total guess. One has to 'read between the lines' of 
> what one says, how they say it.
> 
> Robin now takes a position that, as far as the direction most people on this 
> forum, especially the TM TBs, this was clearly wrong. And he has undone 
> himself with regard to this spiritual direction and seems to have adopted 
> another one. But in negating and destroying the perception he claimed he had 
> achieved, this would, it would appear, that he has destroyed the perception 
> necessary to evaluate this particular kind of spiritual odyssey, that is 
> unity consciousness, or just unity. Now he has 'replaced' this with another 
> kind of spiritual perception, which on the face of it, would indicate all of 
> us other peons on the forum have made a serious mistake. My opinion on this 
> is he has taken a road down a Catholic or Catholic-like doctrine, a definite 
> religious doctrine.
> 
> For me, attempting evaluation of someone else has to do with being internally 
> and externally rather like nothing. Spirit is basically like nothing, like 
> the hole in a donut. One 'compares' the person one is evaluating in an 
> attempt to see how much like nothing they are. This is rather the opposite of 
> 'personal ontology' which Robin espouses.
> 
> Of course the other thing Robin could be doing, in the wake of the disaster 
> of being a world teacher, is regressing to another path that he now feels 
> more comfortable with, a path through Catholicism or an analogue thereof, 
> wherein he is discovering his relationship with the wholeness of life via the 
> concept of God and this god's attendant attributes, such as Jesus etc. This 
> is the way Christian saints have evolved spiritually.
> 
> Whatever path one follows, it has to seem real to one, for a long stretch of 
> the journey, it has to seem real, otherwise one would not keep tagging along 
> that path. Thus, I see spiritual progress as a kind of hallucination, one 
> that seems grander than the usual day-to-day grind of living, that leads us 
> on. If spirituality is really real, and at the end, we find reality, what is 
> it that is at the end of the path? If you get to the end of a path, it stops. 
> What is there? You cannot go any further.
> 
> In TM this is expressed as the unbounded field of life. It is unbound, no 
> boundaries. Both inside and outside. What is that like? Pure spirit? Empty 
> space? A donut hole of infinite extent? Zen Buddhists call it the Void. The 
> Taoists the uncarved block. I do not know what Christians call the end of the 
> path; most of the versions there seem to put that result after you die, so 
> pretty much you cannot find out during life. Christian mystics have a 
> different take on this, but as I was never a Christian my knowledge of this 
> area of spiritual hiking is rather scant.
>


Reply via email to