--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" authfriend@ wrote: > > > Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we > > know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by > > him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?).
Yea, it's a pretty low inference to make. But it is from the same playbook that states that if someone writes something and then attributes it to someone else, by signing another persons name to it, then that person, to whom it was attributed is within their rights to ask that this not be done again, but not to claim that they are being misrepresented. Keep in mind that the misappropriation may remain forever on the internet unless it is deleted. You would think that, apart from stating something is an obvious parody, that the party who made the misrepresentation would apologize and make a retraction of some sort. Instead the misrepresented party is asked to prove that they were misrepresented, and then be judged as to whether or not they were misrepresented by others who have shown themselves to be hostile to this person in the past. You wonder what the #1 point stated above could possibly morph into. That others found the situation so funny indicates to me a lack of empathy should they find themselves in that same situation. > Judy at her finest.> > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > So Emily and I are cool now. Have fun with > > > > > > whatever this thing is that seems to interest you. > > > > > > > > > > Have fun believing that you and Emily are cool now. > > > > > > > > I'm pretty sure that if you play the song "Imagine" > > > > backwards, it generates one of your posts. > > > > > > > You may be cool with Emily, Curtis, but I doubt she's > > > cool with you. After calling her motives into question > > > so brutally, do you really think she trusts you? Just > > > curious... > > > > There's a number of things Curtis can't change. > > > > 1. He can't change the ugly email Sal wrote Emily accusing > > her of being mean to him. > > 2. He can't change the fact that he then defended Sal on FFL. > > 3. He can't change the fact that he tried to make Sal's email > > sound like no big deal. > > 4. He can't change the fact that he accused Emily of sending > > me Sal's email to foment a public fight, after Emily had > > explicitly explained otherwise. > > > > Why *would* Emily want to be "cool" with Curtis in light of > > those facts? > > > > Nor can Curtis change the fact that I've also read Sal's email. > > > > Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we > > know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by > > him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?). If he had > > not defended Sal, if he had acknowledged the ugliness of Sal's > > email, if he hadn't attributed ulterior motives to Emily for > > sending me the email, he wouldn't be out of favor with Emily, > > and folks on FFL wouldn't be wondering about his integrity. > > > > If one of my supporters had written a nasty email to > > someone viciously castigating them for purportedly putting > > me down, and I found out about it, I'd call the emailer out > > on FFL by name. > > > > Curtis *definitely* doesn't have the integrity to do that. > > > > > When Emily played off Robin's irony email did you think > > > she was teasing you or did it piss you off? Was your > > > poor treatment of her pay back for a bruised ego or did > > > it have nothing to do with this: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319723 > > > > Good question. But if he deigns to respond to it, will we > > have any reason to trust what he tells us? Will Emily? > > >
