All's forgiven LaughingG. Heck I just spent the whole morning learning the forgiveness prayers. Just in time! Anyway, have fun in NJ. love, LT
________________________________ From: laughinggull108 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 1:07 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to Judy and PS to laughingG I'll take whatever praise I can get. Ever since my "headlights" of awareness, for just an instant, swept across that first post of yours, I've wanted nothing more than to align my awareness with yours so that, through me, you could respond to the posts of others. Some little bit here and there, that's all. Thanks for being such a good sport about my humor at your expense. My opinion of you just went up a few notches. Now, how about that spanking? I can be in NJ in a few hours. Sorry Share. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > Not too bad for a first attempt, gully boy, but you'll do > better with practice. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > Judy, as often happens, I saw what you had written ONLY because I opened > > > the post from laughinggull and tracked down til I found what he had > > > written. > > > > So you read what gully boy writes? <guffaw> To each her own, I guess. > > > > > Because I often enjoy what he writes. > > > > <guffaw again> Get real woman! How can you enjoy anything anyone writes, > > much less gully boy, if you aren't able to *understand* what they write? > > > > > I often don't open your posts at all. Why should I? > > > > Duh, maybe because *everything* I write is the absolute truth and deserves > > to be read by *everyone*, including you? (If you know what's good for you, > > Share, you'll read what I write, or I'll be very, very offended and will > > pursue you endlessly on the WWW.) > > > > > I don't get, and probably partially my lack, > > > > Not *probably* but *definitely*, and not *partially* but *totally*, dear, > > dear Share. > > > > > that much enjoyment or wisdom from them. Even when they're to other > > > people. > > > > Your loss, not mine, dear, dear Share. > > > > > But certainly not when they're to me. > > > > Didn't you read what I just wrote? (wait a minute, I haven't posted it > > yet). Let me rephrase it so you'll understand better: *Your loss, not mine*. > > > > > Even here, look how you pick pick pick at every little point, going > > > sentence by sentence, using rhetorical questions in a confrontational > > > manner. And just so it's clear: terrible blooper is your phrase not mine. > > > And I never demanded anything from you. > > > > Share, you're free to think what you want but you would be *wrong*. And > > since your interpretive reading skills are pretty weak...no, let me > > rephrase that...since your interpretive reading skills are *nonexistant* > > you're free to think what you want but you would be wrong, *dead* wrong (uh > > oh, did I just make a death threat?). > > > > > In your need to be negative towards me, you actually missed Marek's point > > > and this caused your negativity to spill over onto his interesting and > > > positive idea. > > > > Wrong again, dear Share. Go back and reread his post (you *can* read, > > right?). The idea was neither *interesting* nor *positive*. Again, get real > > woman! > > > > > If there's something of yours that you really want me to read, if you put > > > "to Share" in the Subject line, then I will attempt to read it. > > > > <guffaw> You're joking, right? Dear, dear Share, please hold your breath > > until I write "to Share" in the subject line of *any* of my posts. Come > > down out of the clouds! > > > > > But can't promise that I will finish reading it. > > > > Again, your choice, but you would be wrong *again*. Just how many *wrongs* > > can you rack up in one post, huh, Share? > > > > > As for acknowledging my mistakes, this current discord between us began > > > with the Russian flash mob upset with Robin. FROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF > > > THAT, I acknowledged that I could be mistaken. And that I was willing to > > > work things out WITH ROBIN. You trounced on that mercilessly in your > > > usual nitpicky style which destroys IMO any possibility for > > > reestablishing harmony. Later when I apologized to everyone, including > > > you, you responded by misrepresenting me. In what I deem a sneaky and > > > dirty fighting way. > > > > How dare you...I'll say it again: How dare you! Only I, and a few others of > > my choosing, are allowed to dredge up past arguments and expect everyone to > > be fascinated by all the interesting details. I'm not going to do anyone's > > homework for them, but if you want to see what *really* went down when I > > demolised Share in the above, please read the list of posts that follows. > > No, on second thought, find them yourselves. As I said, I'm not going to do > > anyone's homework for them. > > > > > So it seems to me that acknowledging my alleged mistakes has not only > > > been unproductive with you, it's also been counter productive. So why > > > would I continue to do so? Answering this question as wisely as possible > > > is what it's really time for. So that's what I'm aiming to do. > > > > Share, what you are *aiming* to do is *wrong* because I said so. So there! > > > > > PS to laughingG: just in case I've been bad in the reply above, maybe you > > > better include FF in your itinerary (-: > > > > Why you little tart you! How dare you try to deprive me of a good ass > > spanking by trying to lure my gully boy away from me! I forbid you to have > > any further contact with my gully boy, either electronically or physically. > > Furthermore, you are to give no credence whatsoever to anything he writes > > because he just doesn't have enough *skin* in the game...and probably never > > will. > > > > <snip snip> > > >
