Barry has become our resident shrink. Everyone is crazy but *him*. http://youtu.be/1d0QND_24DE <http://youtu.be/1d0QND_24DE>
[https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-LNPDBCfUseU/UIJpWuIEWpI/AAAAAAAABk8/\ nommkQs2IwU/s480/Barry%2520Middle%2520Finger%2520Puppet.png] --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Replying to the only part I saw flash past in Message View: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" maskedzebra@ wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > BARRY1: For some reason, I find myself still tripping on a > > > phrase used on FFL yesterday. *Not* on the person who wrote > > > it, but on the content, the idea expressed. The phrase was > > > "Now my love for Maharishi was of course the highest love > > > I had ever known." > > > > ROBIN1:Well, it is true for me, Barry, and I think THIS > > IS HOW I GOT ENLIGHTENED. > > Two points: > > 1. I was writing neither to Robin or about Robin. For > him to believe otherwise is just his "It's all about me" > Narcissistic Personality Disorder kicking in. I was > writing about an idea. I neither expected a reply from > him, or feel that I owe him one. I am making an exception > here because of point #2. > > 2. Robin was never enlightened. As far as I can tell, that > was just his Narcissistic Personality Disorder kicking > in, too, augmented by a little mania and Hysterical > Personality Disorder. > > I would suggest, in fact, that the only person on this > forum who actually *believes* he was ever enlightened > is Robin himself, and that he might be better served by > giving the claims that he was a break. If he feels that > I am incorrect in this assessment, all he ever had to > do was JUST ASK. > > Here...I'll do it for him. If there is anyone here who > believes that Robin was in fact enlightened, and as he > claims in Unity Consciousness, speak now or forever > hold your peace. > > There. Now Robin will know who on this forum is gullible > enough to fall for his shit and who is not. There is no > need for him to thank me...it's the least I could do. :-) >