> <snip> > > In the above "Person Of Interest" scenario, would "X" > > be God? It's an outside agency acting upon the world. > > It has the ability to direct the team to an event before > > it happens and keep it from happening. That sounds > > pretty omniscient and omnipotent to me. :-) > > <snip> > > > [Xeno wrote:] > > > So far, I take Robin's 'X' as the outside agency view, > > > but I have to remain open since I find him difficult > > > to understand half the time. > > > > > I don't bother to try. Which is why at this point I should > > interject to point out that I'm replying to Xeno, about > > his and Jason's exchange above. The Robbster just ain't > > in the equation. :-) > > authfriend: > Ooooopsie! > This is really funny - Robin read a book that nobody here has read, and we get four pundits posting comments, and then an "Ooooopsie!" from the 'authfriend' to the 'turqb'.
LoL! Now that's going into a rabbit hole, fer sure! This is more fun than trying to keep up with 'emptybill' seeing a 'Sri Chakra' on Mars or 'mjackson74' talking to the 'Buddha'! Thanks for helping me understand Systems Theory - that might explain why the boys and girls on 'Graveyard Carz' get so confused sometimes. http://www.graveyardcarz.com/ <%20http://www.graveyardcarz.com/> This sometimes reminds me of that story from India about three guys describing an elephant. LoL! So, I'm nominating this whole thread for the FFL 'inadvertant irony' award for the month of October. Thanks for all the entertainment, really - you have made my day. 'The Most Dangerous Idea Since Darwin' 323885 <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/323885> > Yes, he is, if you're asking about "X." > P.S. You can call me 'g' from now on, since I'm now a great grandfather. LoL!!! > That's one of Robin's original ideas. (That's why Xeno > refers to "X" above as "Robin's 'X,'", don'cha know.) > > And no, to answer your question about "X," while you > could call it an "outside agency," it's not God. Robin has > made that very clear, and there's been quite a bit of > discussion about it. But I guess you didn't read any of > those posts, right, Barry? >
