--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" <reavismarek@...> wrote: > > No, Robin, despite your invitation, I have no desire to discuss other's > failings on this forum, whether real, imagined, or contrived.
Dear Marek, You already have, Marek. You have tacitly judged the response of various posters on FFL to BW to be a matter utterly mysterious to you. *That* is a definitive statement which holds within it a judgment of the validity of a response which sees *no* mystery in this phenomenon. This response of yours to my post is itself a form of negativity--more irresponsible than the response that various posters have had to Barry Wright--who have been crudely and brutally attacked by him--YOU WOULD NOT ALLOW YOURSELF TO EXPERIENCE THE EFFECT OF THIS INSIDE YOUR SUBJECTIVE UNIVERSE, MAREK. Just to clarify: I am saying you are being consciously dishonest in insinuating that your own take on the Barry Wright issue represents some more objective and unbiased point of view (than the point of view of BW's critics). For surely this is what you are attempting to pull off here [see below] by acting as if the whole controversy is being driven by something irrational and unjustifiable. You made a implicit judgement of all those who have been abused by Barry Wright, and who have honestly and from within the very depths of who they are, responded to him with anger, irony, incredulity, satire, sympathy, and strength. How can you keep a straight face, Marek, suggesting to all FFL readers that this Barry Wright matter represents something unfathomable and resistant to reason and common sense? This is a lie of your first person ontology which would wish that this not exist. Fine: you dislike controversy, invective, acrimony: I understand that. It goes very much against the disposition of your being. But to handle this sorrow and discomfort in the universe by making a judgment about it which would imply there is something truthful in BW's response to you: "They provide a nice break from being pursued by psychopathic stalkers"--and that therefore BW's critics hold an experience about Barry--their reaction to him--which somehow is less truthful than your own, well that is rank dissimulation, albeit motivated by some cosmic desire for Buddhahood peace and oneness. The critics of Barry express a feeling and intelligence which makes your post (below) without any substance--or rather without the substance you would have us believe it contains. It contains nothing but a simple wish that the complexity would just go away. You don't want to deal with it. Fine. But you will not be allowed to get away with telling a big fib in the interests of consoling and flattering your friend Barry Wright. Finally: your statement above: "I have no desire to discuss other's failings on this forum, whether real, imagined, or contrived" would have the reader believe you have taken the high moral ground--this is an escape into a false sense of self-righteousness. You are a bullshitter, Marek. Even though, as raunchy said, you contain extraordinary beauty and sensitivity in order to paint that cadaver and perform that religious act of devotion. We Canadians have an inferiority complex: I am over-compensating for this, as you can see. I like your posts--almost all of them. Not this one, though. If I had grown up in Southern California I would undoubtedly be surfing with you. I was, instead, playing hockey at five years old--before we moved to the west coast, where I had to switch sports--and never put my skates on again. Have a great Sunday, Marek. Robin *** MAREK: Dude, your relationships with some folks here has been discussed and commented upon endlessly and by lots of people. The whole drama, with your participation, seems to be a significant engine of this forum. For some unknown and ungodly reason, it is. I don't get it. I don't enjoy it, but it continues unabated, irregardless. I just let it lie, for the most part. ROBIN: Marek, have a look at these two posts. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/324286 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/324468 I would suppose, based upon your recent interaction here in FFL, you have some kind of friendship with or respect for Duveyoung. He addressed BW recently. Did you read that post? [See above] And did you read BW's post this morning about the earthquake off the Queen Charlotte Islands and Hurricane Sandy expected to make land in New Jersey? [See above] You say: "I don't get it". Well, I don't get that you don't get it. This is such a load of bullshit, Marek. Your determined loyalty to BW requires that in order for you to avoid the moral and metaphysical dissonance that is caused (inside you) by the reaction people (like the dude Duveyoung) have to BW that you must pretend that this controversy over your friend BW persists "[f]or some unknown and ungodly reason". What an absurd and shameless position to take--although I believe your deepest philosophical commitments require that you stay away from the fray. ["I just let it lie, for the most part."] But for you to imply (I am sure Susan had a raunchy goat of ecstasy when she read what you wrote here) that it is an honest source of perplexity, this business of people's reaction to BW, that is beyond the pale, Marek. And utterly indefensible. Would you ask your friend Duveyoung this same question? "Why did you write that post berating Barry, Duveyoung? I don't understand what your problem is with Barry. Not only this, I am going to express my wonder and dismay that this mysterious phenomenon "continues unabated, irregardless"'. And Barry's conjecture about weather being karmic in regard to those two critics--much more honest than you are, by the way, Marek: is that the thinking of someone who goes innocently to the slaughter here on FFL? There is quiet murderous violence (with a silencer) you do to the truth here, Marek. And I am calling you on it. Unless you can possibly defend your position--which you cannot.
