[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: The Science of Compassion, for Wednesday to oxcart

[authfriend]

Here Share does again what she typically does: When she's
challenged, she avoids responding to the challenge and
instead attacks the challenger; or she responds with a non
sequitur.

She apologized subsequently for her nasty comments about
oxcart not using his real name, apparently not having
realized how common this is and that there are good reasons
for it. But the point is her refusal to address criticism
or challenge. She might as well be Barry; that's how he
deals with it.

Her whole response here is an attack on oxcart that is
itself a non sequitur.

What if there are, say, five people who have the same
criticism of one person and all post about it? Is it
justifiable to attack them as cowards for "ganging up"
in voicing that criticism? Or is that just a way of
ducking the criticism?

Also note that oxcart didn't say anything about "courage."
That was another non sequitur from Share. oxcart's
criticism had to do with honesty and truth--which are
nowhere to be found in Share's response. Nor is courage.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> Yes it is just oxcartspeaking and yes, what do you know? What do you know 
> about honesty and truth given that you don't even use your real name here? 
> And how much courage does it take to say anything to anyone when one is 
> hiding behind an unreal name? How much courage does it take to gang up with 
> several others against someone? In both cases, not much courage at all. IMO.
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: oxcart49 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 8:28 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: The Science of Compassion, for Wednesday to 
> RWC
>  
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > Robin, I am at peace about all that.  I hope you are too.  I was 
> > explaining to Great Grandfather Richard for whom It's all about not going 
> > down any rabbit holes.  Thus he might have missed a crucial part of our 
> > previous exchanges.  Wishing you all the best always, Share
> 
> One day you will hopefully come to understand something about yourself Share. 
> And it is just oxcart speaking and maybe what do I know? But watching your 
> interaction between woelflebater and Robin in particular I see that you side 
> step beautifully and that fan you use to cover your real face has a smiley 
> face painted on it. But what is behind the paper thin fan is the real deal 
> and it doesn't resemble the smiley face very much, IMHO. When you wish 
> someone "all the best always" it doesn't make up for the really important 
> things like the absence of honesty and truth.