Oh wait feste baby..I just realized this behavior of yours can be attributed to the Judy effect I talked about yesterday, she's real good at weeding out paranoid, hysterical, idiotic, hypocritical and/or deceptive behavior. Anyway the remedy is same - either consult the spiritual slut Buck who has a big list of people you can choose or Share who can hook you up with either a healer, pastoral counselor or quantum light weaver.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com>wrote: > LOL...Feste baby..If you had something you would have - I have always > treated you as an idiot and you have never disappointed me. Anyway stop > being so paranoid and check with your friends Share and Buck - they should > be able to find the perfect healer to take care of this problem. > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:18 PM, feste37 <fest...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> ** >> >> >> Why should I bother to reply to a fucking retard like you? >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> >> wrote: >> > >> > You clearly have no interest because you are spewing deceptive garbage >> and >> > getting called on it by Judy. >> > >> > This is what you said in the first post Judy posted, in a nutshell - "I >> > would say: Stuff happens. Get used to it.". It's not like you absolved >> > Robin of anything - just that you exhorted others to not get stuck in a >> > victim mode. So what opinion/judgement have you changed now - that >> people >> > should be stuck in a perpetual victim mode? Or are you are on a whole >> > different tack now similar to Share - that Robin is still the same old >> > manipulator because you certainly didn't express that back in August - >> do >> > you have any new information you are withholding from us. Can we expect >> > Share styled attacks that amount to nothing - a few clues to start off, >> > back biting friends, personal emails and then more? >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:06 PM, feste37 <feste37@...> wrote: >> > >> > > ** >> >> > > >> > > >> > > I have zero interest in whether what I say makes any sense to you. I >> have >> > > nothing to prove or defend. >> > > >> > > Thanks for "retweeting" some of my old posts. I enjoyed reading them >> > > again. >> > > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> >> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Sounds pretty unlikely to me. I would need to see documentary >> > > > > > > evidence that this laughter did in fact take place. And do you >> > > > > > > think anyone will believe for a moment that you just "came >> > > > > > > across" this post of mine when you were actually "looking for >> > > > > > > something else"? Now THAT is definitely making ME laugh! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm sorry if it's deflating to your ego, feste, to learn >> > > > > > that I wasn't after one of your posts but was looking for >> > > > > > somebody else's. I had completely forgotten that you had >> > > > > > been so effusively supportive of Robin back in August, >> > > > > > right after Lordknows had appeared to denounce Robin and >> > > > > > turn FFL into a War Crimes Tribunal. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > You do know Lordknows and Bill Howell, author of "Cult," >> > > > > > are very close friends, right? They're allies in this >> > > > > > effort to "get" Robin. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > That's what made me laugh about this second post of yours >> > > > > > from August that I turned up: it's anti-Lordknows and pro- >> > > > > > Robin, whereas your current ugly posts are anti-Robin and >> > > > > > pro-Howell. Quite a 180. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I understand why you don't want to explain yourself. I >> > > > > > think we all know what caused the turnaround, and you >> > > > > > don't want to look any more foolish than you already do. >> > > > > >> > > > > All opinions and judgments are subject to revision based on >> > > > > new information. It would be foolish not to do so. >> > > > >> > > > Right. But that isn't why you did that 180. >> > > > >> > > > In any case, one would have to question your judgment in >> > > > reversing your spontaneously positive opinion, which was >> > > > based on current information, as a result of encountering >> > > > old information from 25-plus years ago. The current >> > > > information, you see, is the same as it was when you >> > > > formed your first opinion. And the current information >> > > > actually *includes* all that old information--not in the >> > > > same detail, but in no less condemnatory terms, even more >> > > > condemnatory in some cases. *Self*-condemnatory. >> > > > >> > > > If you held a positive opinion of the person who had >> > > > revealed to you the damage he had done a quarter of a >> > > > century ago, what would be the basis for taking the >> > > > opposite opinion after encountering the same information >> > > > revealed by somebody else? >> > > > >> > > > It doesn't really make much sense, feste. >> > > > >> > > > This time I actually did go looking for your posts, feste. >> > > > Found these, among others: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I've been enjoying your posts because of the intense intellectual, >> > > spiritual, >> > > > and emotional drama they reveal going on at what sounds like a very >> > > exalted >> > > > level of experience. I find these accounts quite remarkable, worthy >> of a >> > > > Nietzsche or a William Blake, both of whom lived vast inner lives, >> and >> > > very >> > > > dramatic ones, too, where few could follow. It cannot be easy. >> > > > >> > > > I also found it very interesting, indeed unique from what I know >> of, to >> > > read of >> > > > someone who consciously removed himself from unity consciousness and >> > > > reestablished his identity as a personal, individual self that >> stands in >> > > a >> > > > subordinate relationship to a divine Other. >> > > > >> > > > <snip long description of personal experiences of God> >> > > > >> > > > Once again, I have enjoyed your posts, MZ, which are written with >> such >> > > grace and >> > > > conviction and ruthless honesty. I think you are on an amazing >> journey. >> > > > >> > > > --feste37, July 2, 2011 >> > > > >> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/281378 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > You're a beguiling guy, MZ, a seducer, a lover, a Minotaur, no less, >> > > luring the >> > > > unsuspecting into your labyrinth of delicious words. It was post no. >> > > 281584 you >> > > > recall. Reading your posts just after your arrival here stimulated >> me >> > > actually >> > > > to write something thoughtful that was longer than two sentences. >> No, I >> > > do not >> > > > see you as dogmatic but as someone who rides gigantic tidal waves of >> > > "feeling >> > > > intellect" (the phrase is not mine but Wordsworth's) wherever they >> > > happen to go >> > > > and then proclaims the truth as it appears to you from whatever >> > > metaphysical >> > > > beachhead you find yourself newly occupying. Before the next tidal >> wave >> > > comes . >> > > > . . "Old men should be explorers," wrote Yeats, and, although we are >> > > surely not >> > > > yet old, Yeats was also, surely, right. >> > > > >> > > > --feste37, January 12, 2012 >> > > > >> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301619 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I don't have time to read more than a small part of what gets posted >> > > here, but >> > > > I do want to say that I like Robin Carlsen. I think his views and >> > > experiences >> > > > are interesting. I don't think it's necessary to be steeped in >> knowledge >> > > of MMY >> > > > to understand what Robin is saying (as someone has suggested). It's >> a >> > > modern >> > > > take on the age-old East-West division: Christianity insists that >> > > creature and >> > > > creator remain separate, even when in close communion, while the >> East >> > > emphasizes >> > > > the unity of atman and Brahman (or however they express it). Someone >> > > said, in >> > > > the 1960s I think, that the road to Canterbury (or Rome for that >> matter) >> > > was now >> > > > via Benares, and this is surely the road Robin has traveled. I >> think he >> > > > expresses his point of view with passion and conviction and an >> > > uncompromising >> > > > dedication to the truth. Add to that a graceful wit, a willingness >> to >> > > engage >> > > > fully with those who disagree with him, great verbal dexterity and >> > > ingenuity, >> > > > and a civilized demeanor, maintained even while under vicious, >> sneering >> > > attacks >> > > > from certain people, and we have an FFL contributor who is to be >> > > admired, in my >> > > > opinion, even if I may not agree with all his views. >> > > > >> > > > --feste37, July 19, 2012 >> > > > >> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/314850 >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> > >
