Starbucks - terrible coffee. No flavor, no nuance, no aroma, no taste.
>________________________________ > From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com" <doctordumb...@rocketmail.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 2:35 PM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates >Cyberstalkers > > > >Speaking of addicts, drive past a Starbucks on a rainy workday morning at 5:30 >AM, and the cars are lined up around the building, waiting for the needle. Its >pretty creepy! > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: >> >> You are right, and I misstated your name and used the word "life" instead of >> "like" - it was before I had experienced the psychoactive effect of the >> coffee I drink every morning, like a good addict should.  At least, that's >> the best excuse I can come up with for now.  I'm sorry.  >> >> >> >> >________________________________ >> > From: salyavin808 >> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:17 AM >> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates >> >Cyberstalkers >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: >> >> >> >> Not to worry, Carol.  I've been called creepy too.  Sal and Barry >> >> are exercising double standards - it's O.K. for them to trash TM and >> >> TM-doers repeatedly, >> > >> >Erm, who does this? >> > >> >but not O.K. for you to post a balanced review of your experience with Mr. >> >Knapp and his counseling services.  Makes no sense at all.  Glad you >> >showed up here and post as much and about whatever you life as often as you >> >like.  There is nothing but benefit to be gained by multiple >> >perspectives.   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >________________________________ >> >> > From: Carol >> >> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> >> >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:09 AM >> >> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates >> >> >Cyberstalkers >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Hey Saly.. >> >> > >> >> >Thanks for you analysis. But, like Barry, you know little and almost >> >> >nothing about me or the situation. >> >> > >> >> >If you bothered to read before throwing out your analysis, maybe you >> >> >could state some criticism that is factual and holds some weight. I'm >> >> >not out to get anyone on my side. Regardless, as I stated to Barry, your >> >> >impression is noted. >> >> > >> >> >As far as Knapp not being around to defend himself, he can come here and >> >> >defend himself if he so desires; it's a public board. >> >> > >> >> >All that said, the Knapp discussion is pretty much dead at this >> >> >point...except that you bring it up here. >> >> > >> >> >Combining yours and Barry's labels toward me, I am a creepy loon. Loons >> >> >fly, they don't creep. >> >> > >> >> >Happy 2013... >> >> > >> >> >************** >> >> > >> >> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Since I'm obviously one of the people Barry is libeling with >> >> >> > the term "cyberstalker," >> >> >> >> >> >> I can remember when you used to work out what time Barry made >> >> >> his first post of the day, you'd then triumphantly post this fact >> >> >> as though it proved some point. Dead creepy behaviour, kind of >> >> >> worrying you don't have the self-awareness to realise it. Maybe >> >> >> Carol shouldn't take your analyses at face value? >> >> >> >> >> >> But Carol is a bit creepy too, she turns up here simply to rubbish >> >> >> someone who isn't around to defend themselves to a bunch of >> >> >> people with - what? a presumed shared dislike of TM? Is that what >> >> >> this is about, TM gets criticised here and J Knapp does some >> >> >> criticising too so therefore there must be something deficient with >> >> >> TM critics? Or does she assume we are all good mates and is trying >> >> >> to drive a presumed wedge between anyone who might have TM-free >> >> >> sympathies? >> >> >> >> >> >> Whatever it is, it doesn't come across as a public service >> >> >> announcement, more like some revenge fantasy. The only thing that's >> >> >> obvious is that she needs more therapy to work out why she behaves >> >> >> in this peculiar way. I fear that getting Judy on her side will >> >> >> only entrench it, you don't find healthy closure from someone who >> >> >> has to work out what time her "enemies" get out of bed in the morning >> >> >> when they live on the other side of the atlantic. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >
