--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: > > Not to worry, Carol. Â I've been called creepy too. Â Sal and Barry are > exercising double standards - it's O.K. for them to trash TM and TM-doers > repeatedly,
Erm, who does this? but not O.K. for you to post a balanced review of your experience with Mr. Knapp and his counseling services. Â Makes no sense at all. Â Glad you showed up here and post as much and about whatever you life as often as you like. Â There is nothing but benefit to be gained by multiple perspectives. Â Â > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Carol > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:09 AM > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates > >Cyberstalkers > > > > > >Â > >Hey Saly.. > > > >Thanks for you analysis. But, like Barry, you know little and almost nothing > >about me or the situation. > > > >If you bothered to read before throwing out your analysis, maybe you could > >state some criticism that is factual and holds some weight. I'm not out to > >get anyone on my side. Regardless, as I stated to Barry, your impression is > >noted. > > > >As far as Knapp not being around to defend himself, he can come here and > >defend himself if he so desires; it's a public board. > > > >All that said, the Knapp discussion is pretty much dead at this > >point...except that you bring it up here. > > > >Combining yours and Barry's labels toward me, I am a creepy loon. Loons fly, > >they don't creep. > > > >Happy 2013... > > > >************** > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > >> > > >> > Since I'm obviously one of the people Barry is libeling with > >> > the term "cyberstalker," > >> > >> I can remember when you used to work out what time Barry made > >> his first post of the day, you'd then triumphantly post this fact > >> as though it proved some point. Dead creepy behaviour, kind of worrying > >> you don't have the self-awareness to realise it. Maybe > >> Carol shouldn't take your analyses at face value? > >> > >> But Carol is a bit creepy too, she turns up here simply to rubbish > >> someone who isn't around to defend themselves to a bunch of > >> people with - what? a presumed shared dislike of TM? Is that what > >> this is about, TM gets criticised here and J Knapp does some criticising > >> too so therefore there must be something deficient with > >> TM critics? Or does she assume we are all good mates and is trying > >> to drive a presumed wedge between anyone who might have TM-free > >> sympathies? > >> > >> Whatever it is, it doesn't come across as a public service announcement, > >> more like some revenge fantasy. The only thing that's obvious is that she > >> needs more therapy to work out why she behaves > >> in this peculiar way. I fear that getting Judy on her side will > >> only entrench it, you don't find healthy closure from someone who > >> has to work out what time her "enemies" get out of bed in the morning when > >> they live on the other side of the atlantic. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
