--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Dear Judy,
> 
> Your comments sound like a description of an idealized scientific 
> world, where science is conducted in a sociological vacuum.

Yes, I'm talking about how the scientific method is
*supposed* to work.  It's supposed to be independent
of the sociological context, because today's pie in
the sky just might be tomorrow's new paradigm.

Interestingly, this is just what the editor of the
Journal of Conflict Resolution pointed out when he
published the Jerusalem ME study: this is how it's
*supposed* to work--a study that is methodologically
sound is published no matter how repugnant the
hypothesis--but usually doesn't.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to