Now, on behalf of LuvGemLight who is no longer with us, I would advocate that I spoke with someone about this Gem Light Therapy post of Luvgemlight's, someone who is highly intuitive with clairvoyant capacity, who right away responded that Gem Light Therapy can be quite good for the chakra fields of the subtle system but it is unmodulated in just itself. However there is someone in town here who is a healer who had bought one of the gem lights years ago from the developers before the TM.org bought out the rights to the system from the inventors. ..The things you learn while standing in line waiting for coffee in Fairfield, Iowa! -Buck
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > There is a really interesting article generally about deploying 'public > > > opinion shapers' on the internet. I never realized this could happen on > > > the internet. -Buck > > > "The tactic is similar to China's model of internet moderators who aim to > > > control news and manipulate opinion." Alex? > > > > > > > > > The post was spam. But, it was also sufficiently Ru-ish that I thought I'd > > let it through one time on the chance that people might find it > > interesting. Card's responses lead me to believe I did the right thing. > > > > Dear Alex, is this person any different than many of the polemicals who > particularly jockey and publish here vigorously publishing against their > "online hostile forces"? This one was a fine line between someone trying to > sell sell something unsolicited to an exclusive captive audience (FFL > membership) / (spam) and then honestly trying to clean out some old bad PR > from the internet (published previously on FFL and still in the archive) that > the search engines evidently churn up when looking for "Light therapy with > gems in Maharishi Ayurveda". >
