--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > And another batch--it's 61 now. I didn't count them up, > > > > > but it looks to me as though most of the new ones are > > > > > negative. > > > > > > > > Tsk, the governors aren't pulling their weight. In the UK > > > > if someone gets an article published it goes out on the > > > > gov's email list so loads of positive comments can be put > > > > out before the cynics get find it. > > > > > > It would be smarter, it seems to me, for the devotees to > > > comment *after* the cynics. > > > > Wouldn't work in the Grauniad case as the first comments stay at > > the top of the list. > > Well, but then as you read the comments, your last > impression is of the positive ones rather than the > negative ones. > > But if there are a lot of comments, you're right, because > folks would be unlikely to read all of them and might not > even *get* to the positive ones. > > Maybe half the team should post right away, and the other > half after the cynics are done? > > > Perhaps the NYT list will have some more > > positive remarks near the top by tomorrow? > > How about Jack Forem? He just got added at the top.
Poor MJ. If the TMO decides to sue him for lies and slander he will loose his trailer.
