"And I'm sorry that I don't believe that you have to watch out with the powers of your magical fulfillment of desires because things can get out of hand."
Like I said, beliefs are bad news. Yeah, I am an experience guy. Glad you got that. ZERO experience equals ZERO credibility. I sincerely hope you have a great day today!! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > This is SUCH bullshit Curtis. You cannot both denigrate TM, calling it > > unknown in terms of benefit, which destroys its place alongside any > > legitimate discipline, and at the same time claim that Barry is somehow > > anointed by his extra knowledge, of it - something that, according to you, > > has no value. > > > > Also, getting back to reality, on the subject of expertise, when I just > > turned 22, I became first aid CERTIFIED, which I used that same summer to > > try and revive a stroke victim. However, that was my last actual practice > > of what I had learned. Now, do you want me on the scene if you need it, or > > someone with more current first aid skills?> > > So you are saying that Judy took a more recent TM teacher training course > than Barry? Because would be the only relevant point since we are discussing > the intellectual understanding of the teaching and not hours of mindless > practice. > > Are you saying that you would prefer someone who had never taken a first aid > course to help you in an emergency than a person who had taken it a long time > ago? > > What about the guy who spent the last years getting certified in different > types of first aid courses as Barry has done with different meditations. Do > you think they might have an even broader understanding of first aid than > someone only trained in one system or approach? > > Judy claims that her enhanced knowledge base comes from communicating with > teachers on boards like this. Hasn't Barry done the same on top of his > actual training in teaching TM? > > Jim I get the deal. You are an experience guy and not a book learner. We > have been through this before. I am sorry to tell you that you have an oddly > skewed perspective on Maharishi's teaching mostly to support your self > serving agenda of presenting yourself as an enlightened guy. And I'm sorry > that I don't believe that you have to watch out with the powers of your > magical fulfillment of desires because things can get out of hand. > > When you are ready to show up as non-hostile friendly Jim, I am happy to talk > with you and enjoy our conversations. But on the topic of TM and Maharishi's > teaching you are just not well informed and more than a little scary. > > > > > > According to your logic, you want me. I am flattered, but it makes you come > > across as both an egomaniac, and space cadet. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ha-Ha! I recalled something like that after I posted. So, you only > > > > > top Barry's zero TM meditations by twenty thousand, or so. A pretty > > > > > impressive delta, regardless. Let's watch Curtis wriggle, shall we? > > > > > > > > > > > > Indeed. To suggest that someone has more authority BECAUSE he was a > > > > teacher, and decades ago, must be the most arrogant claim anyone has > > > > ever made on FFL. When the Turq runs out of arguments he makes this > > > > pathetic claim, and now Curtis. Though asked repeatedly what this > > > > supposed authority and knowledge actually consists of Curtis preferrs > > > > to remain silent. The Governors here knows very well why; because we > > > > have no extra, hidden knowledge whatsoever regarding Maharishi's > > > > teachings when the mantras and the Puja is excluded. Curtis is > > > > bluffing, hiding behind a arrogant veil of "I know better because I was > > > > a teacher". It's a blatant lie. > > > > > > Yeah I know, imagine a person who actually studied a field long enough to > > > get certified to teach it claiming to know more about it than a person > > > who didn't... > > > > > > Nabbie you are a Maharishi fan. Think he was a fairly knowledgeable guy > > > don't you? Do you think that listening to (at minimum using a low > > > estimate) 696 hours of the guy would perhaps teach you something about > > > his knowledge? Or do you think that he was such an doddering repetitive > > > old fool that this time spent taking notes (required for most tapes) and > > > being tested on your assimilation of his knowledge would make you equal > > > in information input to a person who never spent that time? > > > > > > Nabbie your intellectual contributions to this site consist of calling > > > people who don't buy into our odd mix of beliefs a poopy pants. > > > Sometimes you post information about beliefs so fey even people who > > > believe bouncing on their butts is the first stage of flying shake their > > > heads and say "that is some funky pseudo-science shit man." Sometimes > > > you post links to music and often combine it with a "your music has poopy > > > pants" swipe at me. > > > > > > I have never seen you engage in a detailed intellectual discussion here. > > > > > > You are not the sharpest knife in the kitchen drawer, you are the one in > > > the back with the messed up handle that squashed the tomato instead of > > > cutting it last time I used it. > > > > > > But even you are gunna claim that almost 700 hours listening to Maharishi > > > teaches you NOTHING? > > > > > > I have spent a little time on the site making a case that Mr. Nature > > > Speaking English was really not all that. > > > > > > But I have never so effectively made that case for his complete > > > worthlessness that you have here. > > > > > > Thanks buddy,keep up the good work. Just stay away from the tomatoes OK? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "This is compared to [Judy's] nemesis Barry who was not only > > > > > > > certified to teach it, but promoted through the ranks to > > > > > > > supervise other teacher's presentation of the programs." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your statement above, Curtis, is both disingenuous, and pretty > > > > > > > arrogant. Doesn't begin to approach the standards of your much > > > > > > > vaunted science-y approach. Here's da fax, jack: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Judy's actual *experience* with TM, since 1970 (43 years ago) > > > > > > > > > > > > Doesn't affect your conclusion, DrD, but actually only > > > > > > since 1975, and I can't claim to have been 100 percent > > > > > > regular in my practice (although I have been on quite a > > > > > > few rounding courses--whether that makes up for the > > > > > > sessions I've missed, I have no idea). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Not speculation, not bullshit, not conjecture - > > > > > > > Daily practice x 2 = 31,390 sessions since 1970. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Barry's actual *experience* with TM, since 1970 (43 years ago) - > > > > > > > Not speculation, not bullshit, not conjecture - > > > > > > > Daily practice x 2 = ZERO sessions since 1970. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZERO TM by Barry in the last *43* years, vs. thirty one thousand, > > > > > > > three hundred and ninety TM sessions by Judy, and yet, you > > > > > > > continue to hold up Barry, as THE EXPERT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, perhaps you see what I mean about belief (which is all your > > > > > > > stance on Barry's TM expertise is based on), being unhelpful in a > > > > > > > current assessment of reality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Barry may be the most prolific bullshitter on here regarding what > > > > > > > he thinks about TM, etc. but despite your supposed focus on how > > > > > > > to validate knowledge, it is plainly obvious to the rest of us, > > > > > > > that given his complete absence of experience with TM over the > > > > > > > last four and a half decades, he does not *know* what he is > > > > > > > talking about. Literally. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
