Steve, are you warning me, correcting me, pointing out something that I don't see? There is nothing untoward about pointing out the phony identities around here, and what masquerades for spiritual inquiry, but is in reality, just that, a masquerade. I enjoy making such distinctions on here, and directly. It is intentionally disruptive. Not for its own sake, but to allow other contributions here also. Seems to be working.:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > I gotta say Jim, as LG said previously, you've got a penchant for > writing, but you seem stuck in petty feedback loop that sort of > underscores what those in the "other camp' have to say about you. Not > that you care of course. It's a tiny audience here, but one could > easily interpret it that you can't be bothered (or are able) to respond > in a more substantive manner. Your choice. Much easier to say, so and > so, is full of shit. Period, final, end of discussion. That is where I > think you are. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > Curtis. since you are, like Barry, humor challenged when it is > directed at you, once again I will clarify my take on the two of you: > > > > I don't know where you and your boyfriend get off on trying to lecture > anybody, on anything, here on FFL. Him with his endless flogging of dead > horses, and you always appearing sparkly and preachy, like a young > republican debutante, or something. > > > > You both come across as a couple of square old biddies, about as cool > as an old puddle, the neighborhood busy-bodies, ready to raise the alarm > at the first sign of challenge. > > > > For that, I refer to you as a less than charming couple, and the image > persists. Tea? > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > My, my, so *bitchy* again, today, Ethel! Bitch, bitch, bitch. No > kiss-kiss and make up? I am sorry you and Fred had a fight, but that's > really not *my* problem. Now, please clutch your self-righteousness ever > closer to your man boobs, and go suck an ice cream cone. You'll feel > better. > > > > > > Love, Your Doctor Dumbass > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing unique about you is your lack of self > awareness. But then, of course you know that. So continue with your > falsehoods and trickery and know that most of us have your number, > except for your girlfriend, Curtis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So let just understand how you are intending this as an > insult to me Jim. Are you implying that Barry and I have a gay > relationship and that this would somehow be an insult because of your > negative views of gay people? > > > > > > > > > > **I don't have any negative views of gay people, though I have > sometimes had negative views of people that happened to be gay. My best > friend for 32 years was gay, and died of AIDS. He was also my younger > brother, RIP. So, fuck you, on assumption #1.> > > > > > > > > Me: > > > > > > > > You have claimed this before and have used it as if it might give > you a pass on some very nasty gender based and gay insults. You only > mention him in this context, and include very hostile curses when you > invoke him as your defense. Like your claim of enlightenment, there is a > very large disconnect between your claim and your behavior. > > > > > > > > If it is actually true it only doubles the idiocy of using sex and > gay references in your putdowns for people who disagree with you or who > you don't like. It is a common theme for your tantrums here, the use of > images of homosexual references as if that is an insult to another man. > It is a consistent theme of how you characterize how Barry and I relate > to each other. > > > > > > > > I am against that kind of insult. Your get out of > homophobia-charge free card has expired. Stop making gay and gender > based insults. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or are you saying that I am a female and therefor worthy of > contempt because I am really an inferior woman rather than a man? > > > > > > > > > > **My wife, daughter, and sister-in-law could *easily*, each > separately, kick your ass. Turn you into meat. #2 goes down in flames > too. > > > > > > > > So your proof of your lack of gender issues is to create a violent > imaginary scenario where your wife or daughter would engage in a > physical altercation with a man. > > > > > > > > Yeah, that was very convincing. > > > > > > > > You don't add up dude. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **Hmmmmm...course correction time, Ethel?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In your anger you always reveal your hidden cards Jim. You > are a very unpleasant person underneath the "I am enlightened, no really > , I am really enlightened, no really I am" rap. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Message number one, Ethel: Enlightened people can be very > unpleasant to fools (like you). > > > > > > > > > > > > My reference was to Fred and Ethel, you and Barry. I just > quickly painted the picture, which still draws a chuckle from me. Read > anything at all into it. Then own it, and act on your assumptions. After > that, you will truly know the difference between experience and beliefs. > Or given your's and Fred's track record, probably not. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > PS Fred called me a "meanie". Ain't that a hoot?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your analysis might apply to people he does not like. > > > > > > > > > > He is not open to being vulnerable to people who he > > > > > > > > > > does not like. Sometimes this is people who attack > > > > > > > > > > him, but not always. He didn't like you right off. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not quite correct. Robin struck me from Day > > > > > > > > > One as someone so uninteresting that I couldn't force > > > > > > > > > myself to plow through his bloviated language. He > > > > > > > > > still does. I clicked on this post of his by hitting > > > > > > > > > Next on the previous one, read no more than the first > > > > > > > > > 10 words and realized who it was from the shitty > > > > > > > > > writing, and only then looked up at the top to confirm > > > > > > > > > the sender. At that point, I hit Next again. I do not > > > > > > > > > and will not apologize for this. Life's too short to > > > > > > > > > waste on pissants, especially wordy ones. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So you only see the version of Barry that applies to > > > > > > > > > > you, a person he does not respect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is more correct, although to be accurate, I would > > > > > > > > > say, "a person he barely acknowledges the existence of." > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I *expected* him to make a reappearance about now. > > > > > > > > > The combination of you being present and his primary > > > > > > > > > devotee and groupie not being present this week was > > > > > > > > > too tempting for him to resist. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
