HeyJim,
I saw Argo with wife and daughter. Wife enjoyed it so much she wanted
to see it again. I enjoyed it enough. I couldn't help but reflect on
all the embellishments, (that's Hollywood, so no problem), and the buzz
that Hollywood loves nothing more than a movie about itself, hence the
Best Pic Award.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...>
wrote:
>
> OK - In other memory news of mine, I saw Argo, and loved it - great
all 'round pic and amazing story. Also finally saw Tower Heist which is
a fun one. And Baby Mama, also enjoyable.
>
> Just watched this week's The Amazing Race, which was different this
time, because during the last show, one of the monuments featured in
Hanoi was a wrecked B-52, shot down during the American War in Vietnam.
This show was preceded by an apology regarding US vets, alluding to the
earlier footage. I figure we were trying to kill them, to continue the
momentum of imperialism inherited from the French, and they defended
themselves, on their soil. What is the problem? Your thoughts?
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Steve, are you warning me, correcting me, pointing out something
that
> > I don't see? There is nothing untoward about pointing out the phony
> > identities around here, and what masquerades for spiritual inquiry,
but
> > is in reality, just that, a masquerade. I enjoy making such
distinctions
> > on here, and directly. It is intentionally disruptive. Not for its
own
> > sake, but to allow other contributions here also. Seems to be
> > working.:-)
> > Wel, by all means, carry on, if you feel that it is working! That's
not
> > quite my take, but who am I. I was just pointing out that you've
pretty
> > much been on restricted diet for a couple weeks now, and maybe you
want
> > to try to add a little variety.
> >
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I gotta say Jim, as LG said previously, you've got a penchant
for
> > > > writing, but you seem stuck in petty feedback loop that sort of
> > > > underscores what those in the "other camp' have to say about
you.
> > Not
> > > > that you care of course. It's a tiny audience here, but one
could
> > > > easily interpret it that you can't be bothered (or are able) to
> > respond
> > > > in a more substantive manner. Your choice. Much easier to say,
so
> > and
> > > > so, is full of shit. Period, final, end of discussion. That is
where
> > I
> > > > think you are.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Curtis. since you are, like Barry, humor challenged when it is
> > > > directed at you, once again I will clarify my take on the two of
> > you:
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know where you and your boyfriend get off on trying to
> > lecture
> > > > anybody, on anything, here on FFL. Him with his endless flogging
of
> > dead
> > > > horses, and you always appearing sparkly and preachy, like a
young
> > > > republican debutante, or something.
> > > > >
> > > > > You both come across as a couple of square old biddies, about
as
> > cool
> > > > as an old puddle, the neighborhood busy-bodies, ready to raise
the
> > alarm
> > > > at the first sign of challenge.
> > > > >
> > > > > For that, I refer to you as a less than charming couple, and
the
> > image
> > > > persists. Tea?
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ no_reply@
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My, my, so *bitchy* again, today, Ethel! Bitch, bitch,
bitch. No
> > > > kiss-kiss and make up? I am sorry you and Fred had a fight, but
> > that's
> > > > really not *my* problem. Now, please clutch your
self-righteousness
> > ever
> > > > closer to your man boobs, and go suck an ice cream cone. You'll
feel
> > > > better.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Love, Your Doctor Dumbass
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@
> > <no_reply@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The only thing unique about you is your lack of
self
> > > > awareness. But then, of course you know that. So continue with
your
> > > > falsehoods and trickery and know that most of us have your
number,
> > > > except for your girlfriend, Curtis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So let just understand how you are intending this as
an
> > > > insult to me Jim. Are you implying that Barry and I have a gay
> > > > relationship and that this would somehow be an insult because of
> > your
> > > > negative views of gay people?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > **I don't have any negative views of gay people, though
I
> > have
> > > > sometimes had negative views of people that happened to be gay.
My
> > best
> > > > friend for 32 years was gay, and died of AIDS. He was also my
> > younger
> > > > brother, RIP. So, fuck you, on assumption #1.>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Me:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have claimed this before and have used it as if it
might
> > give
> > > > you a pass on some very nasty gender based and gay insults. You
only
> > > > mention him in this context, and include very hostile curses
when
> > you
> > > > invoke him as your defense. Like your claim of enlightenment,
there
> > is a
> > > > very large disconnect between your claim and your behavior.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If it is actually true it only doubles the idiocy of using
sex
> > and
> > > > gay references in your putdowns for people who disagree with you
or
> > who
> > > > you don't like. It is a common theme for your tantrums here, the
use
> > of
> > > > images of homosexual references as if that is an insult to
another
> > man.
> > > > It is a consistent theme of how you characterize how Barry and I
> > relate
> > > > to each other.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am against that kind of insult. Your get out of
> > > > homophobia-charge free card has expired. Stop making gay and
gender
> > > > based insults.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Or are you saying that I am a female and therefor
worthy
> > of
> > > > contempt because I am really an inferior woman rather than a
man?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > **My wife, daughter, and sister-in-law could *easily*,
each
> > > > separately, kick your ass. Turn you into meat. #2 goes down in
> > flames
> > > > too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So your proof of your lack of gender issues is to create a
> > violent
> > > > imaginary scenario where your wife or daughter would engage in a
> > > > physical altercation with a man.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yeah, that was very convincing.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You don't add up dude.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > **Hmmmmm...course correction time, Ethel??
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In your anger you always reveal your hidden cards
Jim.
> > You
> > > > are a very unpleasant person underneath the "I am enlightened,
no
> > really
> > > > , I am really enlightened, no really I am" rap.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Message number one, Ethel: Enlightened people can be
very
> > > > unpleasant to fools (like you).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My reference was to Fred and Ethel, you and Barry. I
just
> > > > quickly painted the picture, which still draws a chuckle from
me.
> > Read
> > > > anything at all into it. Then own it, and act on your
assumptions.
> > After
> > > > that, you will truly know the difference between experience and
> > beliefs.
> > > > Or given your's and Fred's track record, probably not. :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > PS Fred called me a "meanie". Ain't that a hoot??
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb
> > > > <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> > "curtisdeltablues"
> > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your analysis might apply to people he does
not
> > like.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > He is not open to being vulnerable to people
who
> > he
> > > > > > > > > > > > > does not like. Sometimes this is people who
attack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > him, but not always. He didn't like you right
off.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > That's not quite correct. Robin struck me from
Day
> > > > > > > > > > > > One as someone so uninteresting that I couldn't
> > force
> > > > > > > > > > > > myself to plow through his bloviated language.
He
> > > > > > > > > > > > still does. I clicked on this post of his by
hitting
> > > > > > > > > > > > Next on the previous one, read no more than the
> > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > 10 words and realized who it was from the shitty
> > > > > > > > > > > > writing, and only then looked up at the top to
> > confirm
> > > > > > > > > > > > the sender. At that point, I hit Next again. I
do
> > not
> > > > > > > > > > > > and will not apologize for this. Life's too
short to
> > > > > > > > > > > > waste on pissants, especially wordy ones. :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So you only see the version of Barry that
applies
> > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > you, a person he does not respect.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > This is more correct, although to be accurate, I
> > would
> > > > > > > > > > > > say, "a person he barely acknowledges the
existence
> > of."
> > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I *expected* him to make a reappearance
about
> > now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > The combination of you being present and his
primary
> > > > > > > > > > > > devotee and groupie not being present this week
was
> > > > > > > > > > > > too tempting for him to resist. :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
