Oh dear Aunt Share, this is not you - the other Share that's destroying your innocent purity. That neurotic b$tch up in Fairfield that's a sweet talking b$tch that hides her delusions behind inane platitudes, visiting every healer, Guru, light worker. She who levels the playing field a la Curtis by her - we all have positive and negative qualities BS. She, like many neurotic birches that I have seen around Amma's cult that accuse men of psychological rape.
Yes a little grumpy dear Auntie but you have made me feel better. I love you. Ravi On Mar 25, 2013, at 7:55 AM, Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> wrote: > dear Ravi, pray tell, who is this other Share and how dare she join FFL! > Though I did not break into applause of any kind, I have been enjoying the > posts of Curtis. And those of just about everybody else. As probably just > about everybody else has been enjoying mine (-: > But why are you picking on Marek? Are you becoming a grumpy boots down there > in sunny San Diego? > > From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 10:47 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Men only, > > > Oh Curtis - I have to say this is a really beautiful slick presentation which > will make the Steves and Shares of this list break into a spontaneous > applause. > > However remember the old adage - you can't deceive everyone every time. > > The magic you weave with your tricks, sleight of hand deceptions is a sight > to behold. > > You start off with leveling the play field on FFL for your pal Barry - all > the voices on FFL are equaled to a robotic set of POV's devoid of any > personal subjectivity of individual posters, devoid of any biases of posters > creeping into their posts. > > It's all POV's - the voice of Ann is no different from Barry, the posts of > Emily no different from azgrey. > > And you Curtis are this supremely disinterested, impartial poster who is > constantly adjusting his POV based on other's POV's. > > But wait, what do we have here? > > Well Barry has likes and dislikes as anyone else. Oh you go further - he > gives it back good to people who give the poor guy a hard time. > > And then Judy is someone who directs her toxic energy towards a stranger (you > !!) on an internet forum. Robin is an insincere, condescending fool who > insults others. > > Oh boy your theory has completely broken down here. > > His Holiness is now no impartial, disinterested poster - he is delivering his > judgement with impunity. > > Curtis - you seem to really crave for adulation and praise from your pack of > males. It is so perverse and juvenile - this male pack mentality can be > forgiven in the teenagers of Steubenville not a bunch of 60 year old's who > claim to be philosophers, lawyers, educators, artists. > > You and Marek are blind to this male pack mentality that is so eager to > makeup for the flaws of your pack - the Barry's and azgrey's and their vile > filth on FFL - disgusting and pitiful. Your dishonesty and deviousness is > sickening. > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:48 PM, curtisdeltablues > <curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Your analysis might apply to people he does not like. > > > > Curtis, Barry does not like anyone who disagrees with him.> > > I don't see a lot of people not agreeing with Barry. I see a lot of people > attacking him personally. > > <His criteria for liking or not liking someone are very transparent and quite > simple. They include more than the one I just mentioned, but ultimately he > dislikes personal challenge coming from others.> > > He expressed his dislike for you and Robin before any of that happened. ( His > objection to my use of dislike here is noted.) > > > < If that challenge takes the form of anything resembling a different > viewpoint or one that makes him have to question his very rigid beliefs or > one that requires him to retract, apologize or question his position he will > take that as a personal attack or as a sign of boringness, cuntness, small > mindedness or stupidity on the part of that person.> > > I might have to see an example of this. I am more familiar with the > predictable "Barry is bad" meme that flows freely here. I see more actual > personal attacks than a challenge to beliefs. And I am not denying that he > both gives as good as he gets and sometime initiates the insult cycle as he > did with you and Robin. But since then the nature of your posts about him > have been more insult to belief challenging as has Robin's. > > > > > > > He is not open to being vulnerable to people who he does not like. > > > > Barry is never vulnerable on this forum. Ever.> > > > > > Sometimes this is people who attack him, but not always. He didn't like > > > you right off. So you only see the version of Barry that applies to you, > > > a person he does not respect. > > > > Barry doesn't begin to have the tools to "deal" with Robin. He is so far > > out of his depth, his comfort zone his perception of what is unknown or > > possible that to actually interact on even the most superficial level with > > Robin would require something Barry simply does not possess or refuses to > > acknowledge. It is kind of like asking a seal to run the 100m dash in 10 > > seconds on dry land. Not possible.> > > I guess we don't hold the same lofty view of Robin's intellect. His attack on > Barry was actually very simple but he stretched it out endlessly. And his > response to my challenge to his belief was not met with anything close to > thoughtful dialogue. it was his routine. All insults masquerading as if he > was considering my points. A snarky farce dripping with the insincerity and > condescension that is his trademark. > > For me, intellectually there is not too much there there, just a penchant for > wordiness. And he recycles his insults, he has used the same claims about me > and others here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > BW, then, does not allow the reader, either consciously or > > > > unconsciously, to derive any experience of what kind of experience BW > > > > must be having as he so slovenly and insincerely (the latter is quite > > > > subtle and can easily be missed) argues for his position.> > > > > > > The digs aside (slovenly? insincerely?) I don't believe he sees any > > > reason to share anything with people he does not like or respect. > > > > This excuse of "respect" is not about that at all. That is a convenient but > > erroneous description of what is really going on. It isn't about what Barry > > feels about the other person it is what the other person makes Barry feel > > about himself and THAT is what Barry dislikes.> > > You may be giving yourself a bit too much credit for insight into his motives > here. I have never seen you interact with him in a detailed way to warrant > your confidence in this theory. I just don't believe you are in a position to > know this from your interactions with him or your observations of him. You > frankly don't seem very sensitive yourself when you deal with him. And I > don't really blame you given your contentious history with him, but it > doesn't lead to knowing much about him beyond the insult persona you are both > running toward him and getting from him. > > < When he is made to feel inadequate he will point his finger at the other > person and claim they are to blame; they are too boring or stupid or > dogmatic. He will never take responsibility for himself and the reasons he > feels the way he does. It will always be about the other guy.> > > Funny thing is that I could say this about Judy or Robin or Jim, plenty of > people here. But the concept of taking "responsibility" for the reasons he > feels the way he does is loaded with a lot of presumptions that I don't > share. I think many people try to rub his nose in what they believe are his > reasons for how he feels as you did above. Who would like to have their nose > rubbed in that kind of unfriendly assumptiveness. I don't. Robin is a fan of > this kind of attack and if you don't cower to his self-assumed special > perceptiveness it is used as evidence of some other flaw. It is a double bind > mind-fuck and very unpleasant. Did you accept Barry's assumptions about your > motives on FFL? Of course not and I don't think you should have. But that > sword cuts both ways. > > > > > >He just calls it as he sees it and moves on. His blasts are not an opening > > >for a dialogue, they are just projections of his POV, more writing > > >exercise than conversation. > > > > Exactly. > > > > > > If you look at the list of people who have received such attention they > > > often have some similar traits that Barry is outspoken about not > > > respecting or liking. I have a very good idea of his POV from his pieces > > > contrary to your perspective. If a new poster showed up here today I > > > could probably predict with good accuracy how Barry would react to them. > > > It was easy to predict that you were not gunna be friends. > > > > Yes, I will give you that. Barry IS predictable. Ridiculously so. This is a > > man who lives in a world that is bound and known and very limited. He can > > only venture so far with a person - new acquaintance or old. When he hits > > the property line, where the boundaries end, he stops dead. And those > > boundaries are those determined by his own limitations of self. > > I disagree with this assessment. Barry does not live in a world that is bound > or limited, quite the contrary, he has traveled a lot of very interesting > roads and continues to. I don't know anyone who has moved their life to more > places since I have known them. He is perfectly comfortable dropping in to a > country with a new language every few years and adapting to the local > culture. And he has certainly been down more spiritual paths than most here. > Can you really say he has a more limited world than people here who have > never traveled as he has, or exposed to just TM for self-development? > > Limited? Not in my opinion. The diversity of his exposure and the lack of his > limits is the most interesting thing about him for me. > > > > > > > So your statements probably do apply to you. You may not have the ability > > > to see where he is coming from and he seems hidden from you. > > > > I don't think so Curtis. Many people have pretty good ideas of how Barry > > functions but Robin's today took the proverbial cake; it was far and away > > the most sophisticated reading of the man and one that you might have a > > chance of comprehending but Barry never will for, if he could, it would > > disprove what Robin wrote and what I have just said. Not that we said or > > are saying the same thing. > > I comprehended it, and appreciate your confidence that I might be able to. I > didn't find it sophisticated,at all, it was Robin routine 101, and since I > spent some time as its target, it is quite familiar. With your background I'm > surprised you don't see it as formulaic. But then you think Judy is brilliant > and have said so many times, so I think we have different standards we are > applying in that area. Robin is obscuring very simple concepts in a word > flood. > > > > > >Do you see Judy as any more vulnerable and interested in really > > >interacting with a person when she is doing her Judy thing? Are you or me > > >for that matter? Once we size someone up as not being worth the trouble, > > >or that they are openly hostile toward us, we all shut down the two way > > >conversation and might say something with no intention to be open
