"Are we clear now, Jude?" This is not Jude but Ann that you are yelling at.
We know you are being paranoid when you are yelling at the wrong person LOL. You promised you were going to try having a life Barry. Is Paris not treating you well? Any issues still renting? Talk to me baby. On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:18 PM, turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>wrote: > ** > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > And then there were two. > > > > I wonder what the chances are for three? Four? Eleven? > > Not much chance of the count going over four at this > point. And as usual, the feedback provided to the > instigator of all this hatred goes completely over > her head, and is perceived as just another opportunity > to try to lure both of us (and Share, her other "enemie > de la semaine" who I forgot to include in my earlier > posts) into extended tarbaby arguments with her. One > has to wonder about a life so empty and so bitter that > this is her only recreation. > > Well, I'm tired of it. There is nothing I can do to keep > any of the four or five of them from posting what they > want about me here, but there IS something I can do to > try to persuade Judy to give up these attempts to get me > to argue with her and "refute" or "defend myself" against > her now 17-years-and-counting attacks on me. Here it is, > in the clearest language I can manage, written last > night but not sent because of a faulty Net connection: > > Because Judy seems to still labor under the delusion that > I feel she is worth arguing with, I will indeed reply > to her, but not quite in the way she expects. > > I apologize in advance to those here who will feign > affront or indignation at the way I am going to phrase > this, but from my point of view I am dealing with an > insane person who JUST DOESN'T GET IT, so I'm going > to have to put things in language that even *she* > might understand. Maybe. > > If the person who is trying her best to get me to > argue with her to "defend myself" against her lame-o > attacks thinks she will succeed, she has *seriously* > missed who I am and what I think of her. Allow me > to explain, to hopefully put an end to this embar- > rassing (on her part) ego-posturing: > > If I were out in the woods, say at a "rough it" camp > or a military bivouac, I might encounter the...uh... > primitive sanitary devices that are constructed in > such sites. For example, feeling the call of nature > (a #2 experience, in TMO terms), I might find my way > to a long latrine trench dug in the dirt, over which > one squats on makeshift "seats" constructed of sticks > bound together with twine, upon which one rests one's > butt while...uh...doing one's business. > > If, finding myself perched on one of these devices, > I looked down and found Judy Stein immediately below > me at the bottom of the trench, rather than take a dump > on her I would compassionately get up and move to a seat > at the other end of the trench. The compassion in this > case would not be for her, but for my own shit. I could > not take the chance of it being fouled and its vibe > being lowered as the result of coming into contact > with Judy Stein. > > Are we clear now, Jude? > > >
