Oh before you try another one of context switching tricks. You have every right to be dismissive of Emily but to pretend and spin as if it's not insensitive, cold and contemptuous towards her feelings reveals your patterns.
Accusing others of being malicious trolls and having shallow agendas - another pattern of yours. Of course you go - oh Emily was being dishonest then you are in real trouble dude - she's one of the most intelligent, sensitive posters who treaats everyone kindly. Good luck buddy. On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com>wrote: > Well stop obscuring my point. > > I said - Your response to Emily was cold, hostile, self-righteous and > contemptuous. You didn't address anything about misinterpretation in your > response. Where was the acknowledgement of Emily's POV? Was she a robot - > was she not entitled to her feelings - unless you think she's lying about > her feelings? Since this in light of Share's accusation perhaps referring > to Robin's responses may help? > > You know what Curtis baby - you don't show any fucking sensitivity (did > you even read the sample response?) and that's a pattern with you - > remember your post on disassociation. No - there's no revealing of my > shallow agenda - it's revealing of your patterns. > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:25 PM, curtisdeltablues < > curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> ** >> >> >> Sensitive Ravi to the rescue. Right, got it. >> >> It was not a gang rape lyric, that was a misinterpretation. >> >> But that distinction will not interest you because you are a troll and >> your posting intentions are unfriendly. >> >> You think you are "getting" a person Judy does not like and winning her >> approval, but instead you are revealing yourself and your shallow agenda. >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> >> wrote: >> > >> > I think a lot of men have incredible difficulty expressing empathy but >> this >> > one seems very cold-hearted and dismissive, as if the person asking >> these >> > questions had no right to these feelings and/or was irrational for even >> > trying to communicate that, viz "I have no idea why you write any of >> this" >> > - I wonder if this is narcissism, disassociation and/or psychopathy? >> > >> > Anyway here's one way I would respond assuming I was innocent. >> > >> > "Dear Emily - I am so sorry to hear that you were disturbed by the gang >> > rape lyrics. Looking back it was probably not a good idea to post it or >> I >> > should have cautioned you that the lyrics had references to gang rape - >> in >> > this day and age one should always be aware that there could be some who >> > would get affected by that, especially victims and family members of >> > victims harmed by sexual violence. But rest assured Emily I had no >> > intentions to PR you, my intentions was just to share some music with a >> > fellow music-lover and in retrospect I should have known that some >> people >> > may have found it offensive. I hope you are feeling better." >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:51 PM, authfriend <authfriend@...> wrote: >> > >> > > ** >> >> > > >> > > >> > > Hmm, as much as Curtis asserts that his goal is "to be >> > > understood by other people here," it doesn't seem that >> > > he is willing to respond to the question Emily asked >> > > him: Why did he make a point of calling her attention >> > > to a verse about gang rape? Instead he just wipes out >> > > her context as if it had never existed. >> > > >> > > Obviously she found it disturbing. Why wouldn't he >> > > respond--unless that's what he wanted, for her to be >> > > disturbed? >> > > >> > > Man, there are very creepy things going on on this >> > > forum lately. >> > > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" >> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > I have no idea why you would write any of this. >> > > > >> > > > I shared music with you that I perform in my show. It has no meaning >> > > directed toward you except I thought I was sharing interesting music >> with >> > > another music lover. >> > > > >> > > > To be clear: There are no hidden messages or meanings directed >> toward >> > > you by any music I ever shared with you on this board, ever. There >> are no >> > > hidden messages toward you in anything I have ever written to you >> here. I >> > > have tried to be clear about what I meant at all times because my >> goal is >> > > to be understood by other people here. >> > > > >> > > > Lets chill on sharing music. It apparently isn't working. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn" >> <emilymae.reyn@> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Curtis: Hey, I was just responding to Xeno on his >> psychological rape >> > > > > post and this spontaneously came off my fingertips: >> > > > > "nor did I [feel psychologically raped] recently, when Curtis >> referred >> > > > > me to the gang rape lyrics of a song he posted. I probably should >> have >> > > > > then, come to think about it, but I just figured I had crossed his >> > > > > boundary again, unknowingly, like I did the first time. I was >> teasing >> > > > > him; he got angry...." >> > > > > God bless it, were you trying to publicly PR me? Did I not pick >> up on >> > > > > that? I'm kind of slow on the uptake sometimes, it's true. You >> never >> > > > > did explain to me why you referred me to the lyrics you did. If >> you >> > > > > were, than I say "Fuck you, man, fuck you." If you weren't than >> maybe >> > > > > you could explain it to me. Am I right in my assumption above? >> > > > > I know you ain't a country guy, in terms of music, but here's a >> song >> > > > > from George Jones - RIP, that may bring you back to a performance >> > > period >> > > > > that would be best left forever. >> > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Onfce-UNmmE >> > > > > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Onfce-UNmmE> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> > >
