I believe the phrase you are looking for to describe your response to this and the previous posts I made regarding your behavior is,
"No Contest" It's all good Rav. It's all good. We're all bozos on the bus. Someone is sure to befriend you and lead you in good directions. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > Please don't humiliate yourself with your frivolous, careless, reactive > posts - day in and day out. How shameless, clueless, brainless can you be - > is there a bottom that you can hit or is this a bottomless pit you are in? > > Take another shot at it, take your time, there's no hurry, I will give my > complete attention to it, I promise. > > Come up with something that has a morsel of dignity and intelligence - > anything - some creative insult, insight, irony. Please I beg you - give me > something Steve baby. > > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:28 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@...wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > Steve - you apparently have a very hard time admitting defeat - you have > > to > > > keep your obnoxious, moronic troll going. Newsflash - you can be > > empathetic > > > and loving to women and also request for blowjobs from women, > > > > uh, wasn't a request Ravi. More a demand IIRC. Why don't you bring it up > > again so we can clarify it, since it still seems pretty important to you. > > > > clearly you > > > are not having much luck in this area and expressing your frustration. > > You > > > have tried many times to bring up references to the incident between > > > raunchy and me but sorry it's not going to work since raunchy will not > > play > > > along with you. Your retarded brain will not understand the entire > > context > > > of that incident and I sincerely apologized to raunchy and it was > > accepted > > > by her. > > > > That's your usual fallback for some of your abysmal behaviors. We saw it > > again today. > > > > I love her and she I believe does too, if she were to meet me in > > > real life she would be convinced as to my sincerity and honesty. > > > > > > > You may want to direct your attention to Curtis who is really going > > > paranoid defending gang-rape and derogatory references to women. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good luck with your delusional fantasies - I hope they provide you > > some > > > > > relief. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Curtis, I actually wouldn't have interpreted it this way. > > Wouldn't > > > > have > > > > > > > > even occurred to me, honestly. *You* are the one who asked me > > to > > > > pay > > > > > > > > "particular attention" to that verse and then put forth the > > "gang > > > > rape" > > > > > > > > description yourself as to how *you* had interpreted it, prior > > to > > > > > > showing > > > > > > > > it to your girlfriend who had made the point that the song > > could > > > > have > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > talking about "consensual" activities in where the woman was > > > > enjoying > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > attended to "down in the pines" (and I paraphrase), which is a > > > > > > humorous and > > > > > > > > more pleasant way to interpret it, I must agree. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Carol also thought it was about gang rape and commented to that > > > > affect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am glad to hear that there were and have never been any > > hidden > > > > > > messages > > > > > > > > and meanings in what you've ever communicated to me. I like to > > be > > > > > > > > understood as well and don't appreciate it when others' assume > > > > > > incorrectly > > > > > > > > what I am posting about without asking me. This is why I asked > > you > > > > - no > > > > > > > > harm meant, as I said in the rest of it that was embedded in my > > > > post > > > > > > back > > > > > > > > to Xeno. I hadn't thought much about it until now - "gang rape" > > > > > > reminded > > > > > > > > me of psychological rape - only because they both use the word > > > > rape and > > > > > > > > then I was like, wait...should I have been offended? I was just > > > > > > riffin' - > > > > > > > > don't take me too seriously Curtis. Your first appraisal of my > > > > > > tendency to > > > > > > > > amuse myself on this forum is not too far from the truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, do you know the history behind the song? I like the song, > > as > > > > I do > > > > > > > > appreciate and enjoy many styles of music. It was an > > interesting > > > > song > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > very poetic. You note below that the lyric was a > > misinterpretation > > > > - by > > > > > > > > you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ravi, I think you should be in charge of all apologies on this > > > > forum. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > *From:* curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ > > > > > > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Friday, April 26, 2013 9:25 PM > > > > > > > > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: To Curtis - were you trying to > > PR > > > > me? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sensitive Ravi to the rescue. Right, got it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was not a gang rape lyric, that was a misinterpretation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But that distinction will not interest you because you are a > > troll > > > > and > > > > > > > > your posting intentions are unfriendly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You think you are "getting" a person Judy does not like and > > > > winning her > > > > > > > > approval, but instead you are revealing yourself and your > > shallow > > > > > > agenda. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula > > > > chivukula.ravi@ > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think a lot of men have incredible difficulty expressing > > > > empathy > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > one seems very cold-hearted and dismissive, as if the person > > > > asking > > > > > > these > > > > > > > > > questions had no right to these feelings and/or was > > irrational > > > > for > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > trying to communicate that, viz "I have no idea why you write > > > > any of > > > > > > > > this" > > > > > > > > > - I wonder if this is narcissism, disassociation and/or > > > > psychopathy? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway here's one way I would respond assuming I was > > innocent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dear Emily - I am so sorry to hear that you were disturbed > > by > > > > the > > > > > > gang > > > > > > > > > rape lyrics. Looking back it was probably not a good idea to > > > > post it > > > > > > or I > > > > > > > > > should have cautioned you that the lyrics had references to > > gang > > > > > > rape - > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > this day and age one should always be aware that there could > > be > > > > some > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > would get affected by that, especially victims and family > > > > members of > > > > > > > > > victims harmed by sexual violence. But rest assured Emily I > > had > > > > no > > > > > > > > > intentions to PR you, my intentions was just to share some > > music > > > > > > with a > > > > > > > > > fellow music-lover and in retrospect I should have known that > > > > some > > > > > > people > > > > > > > > > may have found it offensive. I hope you are feeling better." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:51 PM, authfriend authfriend@wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, as much as Curtis asserts that his goal is "to be > > > > > > > > > > understood by other people here," it doesn't seem that > > > > > > > > > > he is willing to respond to the question Emily asked > > > > > > > > > > him: Why did he make a point of calling her attention > > > > > > > > > > to a verse about gang rape? Instead he just wipes out > > > > > > > > > > her context as if it had never existed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Obviously she found it disturbing. Why wouldn't he > > > > > > > > > > respond--unless that's what he wanted, for her to be > > > > > > > > > > disturbed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Man, there are very creepy things going on on this > > > > > > > > > > forum lately. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have no idea why you would write any of this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I shared music with you that I perform in my show. It > > has no > > > > > > meaning > > > > > > > > > > directed toward you except I thought I was sharing > > interesting > > > > > > music > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > another music lover. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To be clear: There are no hidden messages or meanings > > > > directed > > > > > > toward > > > > > > > > > > you by any music I ever shared with you on this board, > > ever. > > > > There > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > hidden messages toward you in anything I have ever written > > to > > > > you > > > > > > > > here. I > > > > > > > > > > have tried to be clear about what I meant at all times > > because > > > > my > > > > > > goal > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > to be understood by other people here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lets chill on sharing music. It apparently isn't working. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emilymae.reyn" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Curtis: Hey, I was just responding to Xeno on his > > > > > > psychological > > > > > > > > rape > > > > > > > > > > > > post and this spontaneously came off my fingertips: > > > > > > > > > > > > "nor did I [feel psychologically raped] recently, when > > > > Curtis > > > > > > > > referred > > > > > > > > > > > > me to the gang rape lyrics of a song he posted. I > > probably > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > then, come to think about it, but I just figured I had > > > > crossed > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > > > boundary again, unknowingly, like I did the first > > time. I > > > > was > > > > > > > > teasing > > > > > > > > > > > > him; he got angry...." > > > > > > > > > > > > God bless it, were you trying to publicly PR me? Did I > > not > > > > > > pick up > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > that? I'm kind of slow on the uptake sometimes, it's > > true. > > > > You > > > > > > > > never > > > > > > > > > > > > did explain to me why you referred me to the lyrics you > > > > did. > > > > > > If you > > > > > > > > > > > > were, than I say "Fuck you, man, fuck you." If you > > weren't > > > > than > > > > > > > > maybe > > > > > > > > > > > > you could explain it to me. Am I right in my assumption > > > > above? > > > > > > > > > > > > I know you ain't a country guy, in terms of music, but > > > > here's a > > > > > > > > song > > > > > > > > > > > > from George Jones - RIP, that may bring you back to a > > > > > > performance > > > > > > > > > > period > > > > > > > > > > > > that would be best left forever. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Onfce-UNmmE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
