--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> wrote: > > > > > > it's his nature > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:41 AM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For those who think that their perspective > > > on things is always correct > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It isn't. For example, you probably think that the photo > > > > > below is a photo montage, created from several different > > > > > individual photos. > > > > > > > > > > It's not: > > > > > > > > > > http://petapixel.com/2013/06/20/this-mind-bending-colorful-photo-mosaic-is-actually-a-single-photograph/ > > > > > > > > That's right, this is one incredible boring one photo > > > > looking like 4 by colouring in photoshop. Some people > > > > just have too much time on their hands... > > > > > > And some people are so arrogant they make assertions > > > based on ignorance. There is NO Photoshop work in the > > > final photo, as you would have been able to see if > > > you had looked closely at the staged things being > > > photographed. All of the coloring comes from the > > > staging itself. > > > > It certainly looks like he "painted" the left part of the > > table blue in photoshop but I could be wrong ofcourse, > > though I doubt it. > > It would have been *obvious* to you that this is exactly > what he did, if you hadn't been so arrogant as to have > never examined the "Before" photo of the arrangement > of the items. But noooooo...you had to be an elitist. > Your loss...
I looked at the video. What you see is that the left part (and other parts of the picture) is suddenly blue. Did you see that he actually painted it ? No you did'nt, you just assume he did. I assume he painted it in PS. No big deal, but if this is all that takes to get you all excited I wish you good luck with the rest of your life :-) > > > It doesn't make the photo a bit more interesting if he did > > in real world, it's still a boring picture. > > ... > > Anyway, I'm happy that he finds the picture of these boring > > objects fascinating. In his and Curtis's world this is no > > doubt ART :-) > > I never said it was art, merely that it fucks with the > mind and one's preconceptions. Clearly it DID just that > with you. No it didn't, I still find it boring. > > As for the quality or lack thereof of photographs, I > should remind people that the criticism is coming from > the guy who claims to be a "professional photographer" > but has always been afraid to post even a *single* > link to one of his photographs here. Actually I have been looking into ways of posting photos here without drawing the attention to my name from persons like yourself. In fact I wanted to post a picture as a response to a post Ravi's did about homelessness in India since I have a photograph that has been widely excibited of a girl that lived on the streets with her mother and 6 siblngs. The interesting part, at least for a westerner like myself is that even though she lives on the streets, and even though her mother has 6 other children to feed and cloth, she was always totally spotless. Always clean and shining. I like this photograph and would be happy to post it was it not that it would blow my anonymity. I've had threaths coming my way from this place a few years ago and I don't want this to happen again. If you have a suggestion to how to post pictures anonymously I'll be happy to look into it.
