Here, Nabby. This is more at your speed. Catalog this as Crop Circle Misc. http://news.yahoo.com/ghost-lurking-factory-toilet-185540218.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > it's his nature > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> > > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:41 AM > > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For those who think that their > > > > > > perspective on things is always correct > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It isn't. For example, you probably think that the photo > > > > > > > > below is a photo montage, created from several different > > > > > > > > individual photos. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's not: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://petapixel.com/2013/06/20/this-mind-bending-colorful-photo-mosaic-is-actually-a-single-photograph/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's right, this is one incredible boring one photo > > > > > > > looking like 4 by colouring in photoshop. Some people > > > > > > > just have too much time on their hands... > > > > > > > > > > > > And some people are so arrogant they make assertions > > > > > > based on ignorance. There is NO Photoshop work in the > > > > > > final photo, as you would have been able to see if > > > > > > you had looked closely at the staged things being > > > > > > photographed. All of the coloring comes from the > > > > > > staging itself. > > > > > > > > > > It certainly looks like he "painted" the left part of the > > > > > table blue in photoshop but I could be wrong ofcourse, > > > > > though I doubt it. > > > > > > > > It would have been *obvious* to you that this is exactly > > > > what he did, if you hadn't been so arrogant as to have > > > > never examined the "Before" photo of the arrangement > > > > of the items. But noooooo...you had to be an elitist. > > > > Your loss... > > > > > > I looked at the video. What you see is that the left part (and other > > > parts of the picture) is suddenly blue. Did you see that he actually > > > painted it ? No you did'nt, you just assume he did. I assume he painted > > > it in PS. No big deal, but if this is all that takes to get you all > > > excited I wish you good luck with the rest of your life :-) > > > > We did not see him paint it, but there is a clue. A roll of blue tape, > > probably masking tape used for painting. It is on the table just before the > > left side gets 'painted' with blue, in strips about the size of the width > > of the tape. That way the table is not ruined by painting it, you just > > strip off the tape later. The record of the building of the photograph is > > done using stop motion, individual frames each photographed several seconds > > apart, which is how stop motion animation is done (like Willis O'Brien did > > for the original King Kong in the early 1930s). > > > > Analysing a photograph to find out how it was taken and what was > > photographed is not always an easy task. Our eyes can be fooled, but more > > importantly, our minds can be fooled. You missed the roll of tape Barry. > > But Nabby, you jumped to even more conclusions, and none of them were > > correct. > > > You saw a roll of painting mask and assume he painted it. Perhaps he did, and > frankly I don't care how he created this boring picture about as interesting > as watching paint dry. You don't know if he painted it, why is that so > difficult to admit ? I admit that partly the point of showing this nonsense > is that he did paint it by hand. > BTW: I still think some people have too much time on their hands :-) >
