--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's his nature
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:41 AM
> > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For those who think that their
> > > > > > perspective on things is always correct
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It isn't. For example, you probably think that the photo
> > > > > > > > below is a photo montage, created from several different
> > > > > > > > individual photos.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's not:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://petapixel.com/2013/06/20/this-mind-bending-colorful-photo-mosaic-is-actually-a-single-photograph/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's right, this is one incredible boring one photo
> > > > > > > looking like 4 by colouring in photoshop. Some people
> > > > > > > just have too much time on their hands...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And some people are so arrogant they make assertions
> > > > > > based on ignorance. There is NO Photoshop work in the
> > > > > > final photo, as you would have been able to see if
> > > > > > you had looked closely at the staged things being
> > > > > > photographed. All of the coloring comes from the
> > > > > > staging itself.
> > > > >
> > > > > It certainly looks like he "painted" the left part of the
> > > > > table blue in photoshop but I could be wrong ofcourse,
> > > > > though I doubt it.
> > > >
> > > > It would have been *obvious* to you that this is exactly
> > > > what he did, if you hadn't been so arrogant as to have
> > > > never examined the "Before" photo of the arrangement
> > > > of the items. But noooooo...you had to be an elitist.
> > > > Your loss...
> > >
> > > I looked at the video. What you see is that the left part (and other
> > > parts of the picture) is suddenly blue. Did you see that he actually
> > > painted it ? No you did'nt, you just assume he did. I assume he painted
> > > it in PS. No big deal, but if this is all that takes to get you all
> > > excited I wish you good luck with the rest of your life :-)
> >
> > We did not see him paint it, but there is a clue. A roll of blue tape,
> > probably masking tape used for painting. It is on the table just before the
> > left side gets 'painted' with blue, in strips about the size of the width
> > of the tape. That way the table is not ruined by painting it, you just
> > strip off the tape later. The record of the building of the photograph is
> > done using stop motion, individual frames each photographed several seconds
> > apart, which is how stop motion animation is done (like Willis O'Brien did
> > for the original King Kong in the early 1930s).
> >
> > Analysing a photograph to find out how it was taken and what was
> > photographed is not always an easy task. Our eyes can be fooled, but more
> > importantly, our minds can be fooled. You missed the roll of tape Barry.
> > But Nabby, you jumped to even more conclusions, and none of them were
> > correct.
>
>
> You saw a roll of painting mask and assume he painted it. Perhaps he did, and
> frankly I don't care how he created this boring picture about as interesting
> as watching paint dry. You don't know if he painted it, why is that so
> difficult to admit ? I admit that partly the point of showing this nonsense
> is that he did paint it by hand.
> BTW: I still think some people have too much time on their hands :-)
>
I did not say he painted it. The blue color *is* the masking tape. He applied
the tape to the table one strip at a time, and made an exposure from the camera
after each application for the video. What the image showed was you suck as a
photographic analyst. Score one for Turq. Note that Turq is not a photographic
analyst, but he does think in a rational way, and correlates his thoughts with
the world with greater synchronicity that you seem to be able to muster. We all
grow up muddle-headed to a greater or lesser extent, and one of the games of
life is to improve the correlation of our thought with the world.