--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@...> wrote: > > Indeed, I had not followed the whole discussion, it was the > first post in the thread you had mentioned. I do not even > remember if I read the post when it was originally posted > by Ann. I vaguely remember something of that thread. What I > thought was most interesting about it was Robin not really > liking to touch people or being touched. My interest is not > much in this striking business, but what his state of mind > was then, and what it might be now.
And you find the fact that he didn't like to touch or be touched 30-some years ago, and whether he still doesn't, of interest why? You know what, Xeno? I'm much more interested in *your* "state of mind." I find your obsessive fascination with Robin's current "state of mind" (i.e., sanity)--your attempt to find a way to publicly pin a psychiatric diagnosis on him--more than a little unhealthy. And the sneaky way you go about it is just plain creepy. Now, what about the Mystery Cultist? > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > I guess you missed where this post of Ann's was discussed > > at some length in the recent discussion, Xeno, huh? Too bad; > > you thought you had discovered something that was being kept > > under wraps. > > > > Now, any ideas about who the Mystery Cultist might be that > > I quoted, the one person here who actually tried to excuse > > Robin's striking his students in the private setting before > > there were any seminars?
