I specifically targeted Barry, and his punching his brother in the stomach, 
because I wanted to respond to him, as he does others, and get his attention. I 
would do exactly the same thing again, if necessary. Instead of getting my 
point, the best be could do was criticize the fact that my brother was gay, and 
that I could be too.

I was shocked by his juvenile response, though perhaps in a quiet moment, he 
will recognize he is mostly fighting with himself on here.

I also find it fascinating that this guy, who will fling a ball of shit at 
someone, faster than a chimpanzee, is so so very delicate and such a wounded 
child, within. He actually feels that I am not responding to him, but have a 
vendetta *against* him. Pretty fucking sick.

My comments about Barry sharing the same DNA as his crazy brother were not 
meant to be all that funny, just a pointer to his unstable and antisocial 
tendencies, and a possible reason for same.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > turq, I'm sorry about your brother. It sounds like you 
> > > cared about him a lot. Hope you all had some good times too.
> > 
> > He was a funny guy, and yes, we had some good times
> > before the alcoholism got to him. It's a scary disease, 
> > and alcohol-induced psychosis is even scarier. But I 
> > don't want to talk about him here, because Judy and
> > Richard and Jim will just find some way to use anything
> > said the way they already have...as just another tactic 
> > in their "get Barry" vendettas.
> 
> AIDS and alcohol-induced psychosis. Two dead brothers, two brothers left to 
> grieve in their own ways. Not a subject to take lightly or to use to hurt 
> each other. I have a dead sister who drowned as an indirect result of 
> alcohol. Also not something to use against anyone. I think we can all agree 
> on this. My condolences to you both.
> >
>


Reply via email to