I think Harry's dad was her riding teacher or something. It wouldn't be the first time that those male professional horse riders managed to bed the more eligible female students and it won't be the last! Give them a German or British accent and you're home free.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > ooops! I meant Harry. From way over here in California, they all seem the > same! > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Seraphita" <s3raphita@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > > > Not to be picky, but the article says the soldier, who > > > > was a member of the SAS, told his wife that "the unit > > > > had 'arranged' the Princess's death and that this had > > > > been 'covered up.'" > > > > > > > > Why on earth would the SAS have wanted to murder Diana? > > > > > > > It's dirty work but someone has to do it. Diana was snorting coke, > > > sleeping around with whoever took her fancy and generally bringing the > > > Royal Family into disrepute. > > > > I dunno, doesn't seem to me like enough to justify > > murder, at least not once she and Charles were > > divorced. (I mean, not that murder is ever justified, > > but in the mind of the state, as it were.) > > > > > She wasn't able to fulfil her allotted > > > role - a role for which she was a willing volunteer remember. > > > > Not many girls her age and background would have the > > foresight and self-knowledge to turn down the role > > because they realized it would be too much for them. > > > > And she did a pretty impressive job with the public > > part of the role, the royal appearances and charities > > and causes and so on. > > > > Plus which, it looked like she was a very good mother > > to the heirs. Somehow she was able to compartmentalize > > and not let the disaster the marriage had become get > > in the way of doing right by the kids. > > > > Of course they'd have had to be affected by the marital > > troubles, not to mention her post-divorce behavior, not > > to mention her violent death when they were still so > > young. > > > > But from here, at least, it appears the way she brought > > them up made them secure enough to deal with all that. > > Harry looks to be a bit flaky, but William seems solid > > and responsible, if not terribly inspiring. > > > > For me, Diana was a profoundly tragic figure, not one > > to be scorned and reviled. I like Charles, but I don't > > think he was blameless by any means. > > > > > Kate Middleton looks like the right stuff to me. > > > > Good choice on William's part, no? > > > > > No neuroses, feet firmly on the ground, realistic in her > > > outlook - and more attractive, sexually and personally. > > > > I dunno, I preferred Diana's looks by a mile. I can't > > tell much about Kate's personality yet, but so far it > > doesn't seem like there's a lot of it. Maybe that's an > > advantage. The two of them did manage the birth nicely > > (again, from here). > > >
