Regardless of who can live together, love together, contract together, etc., and everyone has a right to choose their mate in what way they choose, the essence and real meaning of marriage is two who can breed together from the conception that forms the blood line. No buts about it. Nature made a wombed man and a man for this purpose of sharing the DNA. If everyone else wants to invite the mad scientist into their bedrooms, well, go for it. That threesome does not change the natural law. Because without that lab, if two people of the same sex were wandering in the Yukon, and met, they most likely would not produce offspring. If a man and wombed man meet, the chances are probable. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FyezVyMFJ8 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FyezVyMFJ8>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Seraphita" wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote: > > > > > > Can't have a British Princess dating a Muslim or marrying him. > > There's also the constitutional point that the sovereign is Head of the > Church of England. If a princess married a Muslim/Hindu/Jew/. . . would > their children be brought up as Anglicans? The issue only arises, of > course, because there's an Established Church; if there were to be a > separation of Church and State it wouldn't matter. They've only just > recently changed the law so that a Royal can marry a Catholic though > that could have tricky consequences too. > Now that they've legalised gay marriage some wags are asking what would > happen to the succession if a king were to marry another man. >
