cluck, cluck, cluck...nuthin' but us chickens here, Rick.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@...> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Alex Stanley
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 11:50 AM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eliminating the Ad hominem Post-count on FFL.
> 
>  
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Rick Archer" <rick@
> <mailto:rick@> > wrote:
> >
> > If the general consensus is to do so, we'll do so after Alex has
> > had his month's reprieve.
> 
> Perhaps, you missed it, Rick, but I made it clear in an earlier post that if
> you restore the posting limits, you will need to appoint another moderator
> to enforce it, i.e., keep track of overposters and shut off/restore posting
> privileges. I will continue to host the post count script on the crusty old
> Dell laptop, and I'll handle the usual subscriptions, spammers, files, etc.
> But, if you don't appoint another moderator, I will simply ignore any
> overposting.
> 
> As for who to appoint, IMO, the heavy users of the group should be the ones
> to handle enforcement of the posting limits.
> 
> Isn't that a bit like appointing the foxes to guard the hen house?
>


Reply via email to