It's Friday. Go have a beer or two. :-D
On 08/23/2013 01:50 PM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
What-The-HELL-Is-That-Supposed-To-Mean!!!!????
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote:
>
> On 08/23/2013 10:50 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
> >
> > *From:*FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:%2AFairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>] *On Behalf Of *Alex Stanley
> > *Sent:* Friday, August 23, 2013 11:50 AM
> > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>
> > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Eliminating the Ad hominem Post-count
> > on FFL.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, "Rick Archer" <rick@
> > <mailto:rick@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > If the general consensus is to do so, we'll do so after Alex has
> > > had his month's reprieve.
> >
> > Perhaps, you missed it, Rick, but I made it clear in an earlier post
> > that if you restore the posting limits, you will need to appoint
> > another moderator to enforce it, i.e., keep track of overposters and
> > shut off/restore posting privileges. I will continue to host the post
> > count script on the crusty old Dell laptop, and I'll handle the usual
> > subscriptions, spammers, files, etc. But, if you don't appoint
another
> > moderator, I will simply ignore any overposting.
> >
> > As for who to appoint, IMO, the heavy users of the group should be
the
> > ones to handle enforcement of the posting limits.
> >
> > Isn't that a bit like appointing the foxes to guard the hen house?
> >
>
> Correct. The "heavy users" seem to be impulsive. They post knee jerk
> reactions. Not a sign at all of the calmness that is supposed to be the
> result of practicing a meditation technique.
>
> >
>
