--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > May I suggest, that while you brought up the phrase in 
> your 
> > > > > > > post, that the phrase can also transcend your own 
> > particular 
> > > > > > > situation. And in a more universal application of the 
> > phrase, 
> > > > > > > (as I intended it, though perhaps not clearly 
expressed) 
> it 
> > > is 
> > > > > > > funny to me. No interpretation involved. Its an 
authentic 
> > > > > > > reaction to the phrase.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > OK.  I think you're suggesting that it's something of
> > > > > > an infinite regress, that one can be overshadowed by
> > > > > > the desire not to be overshadowed.  
> > > > > 
> > > > > No, thats not quite the angle that struck me as so funny. 
The
> > > > > deliciousness of the phrase is more a "mu" experience, a 
> > la "whats
> > > > > wrong with this picture."
> > > > 
> > > > What's wrong with the picture of somebody not
> > > > wanting to be overshadowed?  You've got me
> > > > curious--can you articulate it?
> > > 
> > > I'd love to hear akasha's answer, but mine 
> > > would be, "It's a marvelous way of clinging
> > > to the notion of unenlightenment.  To want
> > > to not be overshadowed, you have to believe
> > > you are.  And the funny thing is, the moment
> > > you drop that belief, you aren't.
> > 
> > Yeah, that answer would be bull.
> 
> And yours would be more clinging.

It would be authentic.

> You don't want to be enlightened.  You want
> to understand enlightenment.

Um, no.  Just don't want to be overshadowed, as
I said.

> Not gonna happen.  :-)
> 
> > Especially from somebody who admits he isn't
> > enlightened.
> 
> But I lie.  Don't you remember?  :-)

Yup.  You said I had lied when I said you tried to
give the impression you were enlightened.

Funny how you're always complaining about the
ethics of the TMO.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to