--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "off_world_beings" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "off_world_beings" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > The word 'evolution' does NOT imply 'purpose.'
> > > > 
> > > > The sentient beings of the universe, as far as I can
> > > > tell, are all evolving.  But personally I don't think
> > > > that there is anywhere in particular that they are
> > > > evolving *to*.  I have no problem with everything
> > > > always evolving, but in a chaotic (meaning Inter-
> > > > dependent Origination) way.  No goal, no purpose,
> > > > just beings interacting and moving in the karmic
> > > > direction spawned by that interation.>>>
> > > 
> > > Then the word 'sentient' is out of place and is an illusion 
> > > that you have placed upon the dead, inert, dumb universe. 
> > 
> > I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here.
> > I'm presenting the POV that the universe is NOT
> > sentient, in the sense of a self-aware universe
> > with its own sense of identity, i.e., God.>>
> 
> In my opinion you joined to completely unrelated ideas together 
> here: intelligence and 'God'. This is the irrational leap that all 
> the anti-intelligent design scientists make. Intelligent universe 
> does not imply the common concept of a 'God' and I have never 
> stated there was a God. You made that leap on your own.
> 
> 
> > I can conceive of the universe being the sum self
> > awareness of all of the sentient beings that dwell
> > "within" it, but I'm Buddhist enough to not really
> > believe it has a sentience of its own.
> > 
> > > You are avoiding the issue which is that evolution has order. 
> > 
> > That's *your* issue.  I obviously found other ways
> > to entertain myself with the same discussion.  I 
> > have no problem with the universe having order.
> > I just don't associate the word 'purpose' with the
> > word 'order.'>>>
> 
> Yes you do.
> Order has purpose. Whatever its purpose is, is irrelevent, but it 
> has purpose imposed upon by the nature of the system that it is 
> expressing. Evolotion absolutlely implies purpose. Its purpose is 
> evolotion. Now define evolution, without calling it chaos. It has a 
> direction.

Whatever floats your boat.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to